Defaming Businesses Doesn't Protect Consumers
If the Consumer Product Safety Commission doesn't have enough data to enact a rule, it shouldn't be making informal recommendations either.
If the Consumer Product Safety Commission doesn't have enough data to enact a rule, it shouldn't be making informal recommendations either.
Elon Musk promised "maximum transparency," but that apparently doesn't include Freedom of Information requests to DOGE.
Most courts have ruled that vanity license plates are private speech and protected from viewpoint discrimination under the First Amendment.
At the current rate of inflation, the dollar will lose 33 cents of purchasing power within a decade.
Dietary supplement bans for minors may spread—but they’ll be costly, confusing, and ineffective.
The authors of a picture book about two male penguins raising a chick together argue excluding their book from school libraries violates their free speech rights.
After a lawsuit from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, the city backed down. But it's still part of a worrying trend.
“I cannot ignore Congress’ detailed framework for refugee admissions and the limits it placed on the president’s ability to suspend the same,” said Judge Jamal Whitehead.
A useful example of how meaningful regulatory reform requires legislative action--and not just the passage of Congressional Review Act resolutions.
The ATF, charged with regulating firearms, has a history of abuse and incompetence.
The presidential adviser's lack of formal authority complicates his cost-cutting mission.
Whether or not a reasonable police officer violates clearly established law when he declines to check the features and address of his target house before raiding it is thus still up for debate.
Interim U.S. Attorney Ed Martin puts loyalty to Donald Trump ahead of loyalty to the Constitution.
From forest restoration to energy infrastructure, NEPA delays projects that would benefit the economy and environment.
The law is wasteful and protectionist. Now, a new lawsuit argues that it is unconstitutional too.
Lawmakers in Arizona and California are attempting to overcome local resistance to meaningful starter home reforms.
"If the Republican budget passes, the deficit gets worse, not better," says Rep. Thomas Massie. He's right.
If Trump wants to encourage domestic investment, his antitrust appointees should ditch their Big Tech prejudice.
A former Afghan intelligence officer who worked alongside U.S. forces sought safety in America. Now, under the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown, his parole has been revoked, and he’s been detained without explanation.
Why is the Supreme Court issuing fewer summary reversals? Is Justice Barrett the reason?
Plus: German elections, how I almost got arrested this weekend, and more...
DOGE may not just save money; it may encourage honesty.
One perk that may materialize from Elon Musk upending the federal bureaucracy is the downfall of the government’s obsessive use of abbreviations.
The president is positioning himself to have much greater control over a smaller, enfeebled federal bureaucracy.
The newly confirmed head of the country's leading law enforcement agency has a history of advocating politically motivated investigations even while condemning them.
The move effectively retcons J.D. Vance's claim that legal Haitian immigrants were actually here illegally.
How well-intentioned laws created new cultural conflicts—and eroded personal liberty
Plus: The Democratic Party's insecurities, protesting Trump via interpretive dance, the Yosemite locksmith, and more...
There's little question that Trump is taking the concept of the imperial presidency to its apogee.
Georgetown constitutional law professor Randy Barnett discusses the legality of DOGE, Trump's executive orders, and birthright citizenship.
It tries to offset as much as $4.8 trillion—mostly for tax cut extensions—with only $1.5 trillion in supposed spending reductions.
Free speech experts say the takedown order is a clear example of unconstitutional prior restraint under the First Amendment.
America’s tax system is already highly progressive. A simpler, flatter structure would be fairer, raise more revenue, and fuel economic growth.
"The only way you get less waste is to give them less money to spend," says the libertarian-adjacent senator from Kentucky.
Elon Musk claims to have uncovered massive fraud within Social Security, but those data are already well known and not a major problem.
Judge Newman files a powerful reply to the unprecedented claim of the Federal Circuit's Judicial Council that she can be suspended from her duties indefinitely. And the Judicial Council's recent hiring of adversarial experts raises new questions about bias against Judge Newman.
His position is grounded in concerns about the separation of powers that presidents of both major parties have raised for many years.
Plus: A listener asks the editors to guess if the real reason Donald Trump is so passionate about tariffs is because he sees them as a deal-making tool rather than a purely economic instrument.
Citing Reddit posts and podcast interviews, pseudonymous government employees are arguing that DOGE violated federal privacy regulations when setting up a government-wide email system.
The federal leviathan can’t be dismantled by executive action alone. To truly cut spending and rein in the bureaucracy, the administration needs buy-in from the branch that built it.
From insurance to affordable housing mandates, California's regulatory noose tightens over wildfire rebuilding efforts.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks