"The Supreme Court Is Not Cowering Before Trump on the Shadow Docket"
"Nor is it taking a new approach."
"Nor is it taking a new approach."
The poorest state in the nation just passed bold tax reform that empowers workers, attracts investment, and simplifies the system. It’s a model worth copying.
A simple and quite symbolic presidential decree that symbolizes quite a bit, but accomplishes very little.
What America can learn from prisons in Norway and Sweden.
It’s not the reform we need, but it’s welcome relief from ravenous and unpopular tax collectors.
Unanimous ruling is a big win for immigrant rights. But it does have unfortunate ambiguities.
Even after Trump paused some of his new tariffs for 90 days, we still have the highest average tariffs in over a century and the biggest trade war since the Great Depression. Real relief will only come if Congress or the courts deny Trump the power to do this.
“I am here to break the law,” Marcy Rheintgen said after being given a trespass warning.
Families described not being told their loved one was in the hospital or even when they had died.
The president’s preferential treatment of fossil fuels will cost consumers.
The government currently collects revenue in an arbitrary and distortionary manner, with loopholes that benefit special groups.
We need a district judge to enter a nationwide injunction putting a stop to these huge unilateral, presidential tax increases on ordinary working-class people.
The Sunshine State is considering a bill that would expand protections for law enforcement officers who use deadly force or cause great bodily harm.
But 10% tariffs are still being imposed on nearly all countries, without any letup. And we are still moving ahead with our lawsuit challenging them.
In the span of a week, Trump cratered the stock market and brought it much of the way back, with little more than public statements.
The Supreme Court did not answer two of the biggest legal questions raised by Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act.
Bills introduced Tuesday in the House and Senate would terminate the emergency declaration Trump issued last week.
The president is politically targeting those he says politically targeted him.
Lottery ticket buyers are disproportionately poor, and the odds are very bad. But governments want the money.
Although the Court lifted an order that temporarily blocked removal of suspected gang members, it unambiguously affirmed their right to judicial review.
The Nobel Prize-winning economist says the Iron Triangle of Politics must be defeated to cut down the government for good.
A federal court ruled Trina Martin could not sue the government after agents burst into her home and held an innocent man at gunpoint.
The Supreme Court oveturns lower court decisions temporarily barring AEA deportations, but also emphasizes that detainees are entitled to due process, and that AEA deportations are subject to judicial review.
Voters said no to constitutional amendments on juvenile justice, government spending, and more.
The president is raising taxes, hiking prices, and creating supply chain chaos. Congress should act quickly to stop this.
Did the 25th president really make America "very rich through tariffs"? William McKinley might have told you otherwise.
The Supreme Court seems likely to agree that a member of the National Labor Relations Board may be fired by the president at will.
The International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize the president's imposition of tariffs, a lawsuit alleges.
They weren't authorized by Congress and go against the major questions and nondelegation doctrines.
A small but growing bipartisan movement in the Senate is pushing back against the president's imposition of tariffs, but there's plenty of room to go further.
The justices unanimously overturned a 5th Circuit decision that deemed the agency's treatment of e-liquids "arbitrary and capricious."
The bill faces an uncertain future, but it is a faint glimmer of hope for those hoping to limit executive power over trade.
The Trump administration says it is shameful even to suggest that immigration agents could make such errors.
The Liberty Justice Center and I are looking for appropriate plaintiffs to bring this type of case. LJC (a prominent public interest law firm) can represent them pro bono.
"Everything looks like a conspiracy when you don't know how anything works," said Jankowicz.
More litigation is required to find out which kits and unfinished parts are subject to regulation.
Bureaucrats in Dunedin, Florida, originally hit Jim Ficken with a fine close to $30,000. When he couldn't pay that, things turned dire.
An economist explores how a stable and relatively just legal order emerged in medieval Japan.
can go forward in part, a federal trial judge concludes.
The state legalized medical marijuana but banned dispensary owners from advertising. Now, one owner is taking the fight to the Supreme Court.
Alleged criminal aliens may face legal punishment. But only after receiving due process of law.
The president is arguing in court that journalism he doesn't like is "election interference" that constitutes consumer fraud.
Donald Trump is determined to make everything from Canadian whiskey to Mexican avocados more expensive. Can anyone stop him?
Evan Bernick's first in a series of guest-blogging post: Part I of a critique of an important defense of the constitutionality of Donald Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship.
A leading expert on habeas corpus explains why the Trump Administration is wrong to claim the case must be heard in Texas, rather than Washington, DC.