States Keep Suing the Feds, but Not in Defense of Federalism
State Attorneys General appear more interested in lining up with their political tribe than they are in defending state interests.
State Attorneys General appear more interested in lining up with their political tribe than they are in defending state interests.
The court concludes that the federal 2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act preempts state battery claims, but not state constitutional law claims.
The feds have no constitutional authorization to meddle in education.
Across the country, parents of gender-dysphoric kids are confronting state intrusion.
To justify the immediate deportation of suspected Venezuelan gang members, the president is invoking a rarely used statute that does not seem to apply in this context.
Invoking the Defense Production Act won't boost the supply of critical minerals.
While he can't get rid of the department outright, a new executive order attempts the next best thing.
Links to audios of a Cato Institute podcast and an interview with ABC News (Australia).
The participants were Adam Cox (NYU) and myself.
California once was the state where a visionary might start up a gee-whiz concept in a garage. Now bureaucrats and powerful unions would crush that concept in its infancy.
The Federal Acquisition Regulation requires the right for the government to terminate any federal contract "for convenience."
Linda Martin's lawsuit alleges that the agency violated her right to due process when it took her $40,200 and sent her a notice failing to articulate the reason.
Superintendents warned open enrollment would overwhelm them. Instead, they have nearly 3,000 vacancies as parents and students have more choices.
More education dollars are funding more bureaucrats, who, by and large, are not improving student outcomes.
"Impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision," Roberts noted after Trump said federal judges who impede his agenda should be fired.
The removals challenge Humphrey’s Executor, a Supreme Court precedent that protects independent agency officials from political firings.
President Trump acts to remove two Democratic commissioners from the Federal Trade Commission. Litigation is likely.
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Jill Parrish emphasizes that religious freedom must protect "unpopular or unfamiliar religious groups" as well as "popular or familiar ones."
In 2020, the Chief Justice condemned Senator Schumer's "dangerous" remarks.
There is no justification for such impeachment efforts.
Plus: Texas midwife arrested for violating abortion ban, JFK files, Gaza bombings, astronauts finally rescued, and more...
They used the Act to deport some 137 Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador even after a federal court issued a temporary restraining order blocking such action.
[UPDATE: I note a contrary argument in an update at the end of this post.]
The president says those legislators are "subject to investigation at the highest level," notwithstanding their pardons and the Speech or Debate Clause.
Plus: A listener asks the editors whether a Kamala Harris presidency would have been preferable.
Retired Judge Gertner and I have filed an amicus brief in support of certiorari to answer the question, which has important important implications for admiralty jurisdiction.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick says the Trump administration wants to eliminate income taxes for those making $150,000 or less—an unprecedented shift with major consequences.
Plus: Democrats' filibuster hypocrisy, Trump bombs Yemen, March Madness, and more...
Dissidents resisting authoritarian regimes should be independent of the United States—and so should their media sources.
Trump is destroying a valuable source of American "soft power" and an inspiration to people suffering under authoritarian regimes.
If courts allow Trump to get away with using the Act in peacetime, it would set a dangerous precedent.
The article is coauthored with Cato Institute scholar David Bier.
A district judge had "found the provisions likely unconstitutional and issued a nationwide injunction" against them; the Fourth Circuit just stayed that injunction, pending full consideration of the issue on appeal.
Musk's fans and critics will keep debating whether DOGE is revolutionizing government or wrecking important institutions.
Passengers suing the TSA for First Amendment violations have had a rough time in court.
The proposed State Department policy would add to the irrational burdens that registrants face.
There is no "royal we" in the marketplace.
The bill is a "law against criticism of any kind," according to a lawyer who testified against it.
Plus: Rate reductions, Apple encryption, the Mahmoud Khalil case, and more...
Environmental Protection Agency
“Environmental justice” has no place at a regulatory agency. But the EPA was already a problem.
The move is part of a broader suite of deregulatory actions announced by the EPA Administrator, and is likely the least advisable item on the list.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10