A Roundup of My Volokh Conspiracy Posts on the Travel Ban
On the eve of the of Supreme Court oral argument in the travel ban case, here are links to some of my more notable VC posts on the subject.
On the eve of the of Supreme Court oral argument in the travel ban case, here are links to some of my more notable VC posts on the subject.
If the Supreme Court rules that Trump's campaign statements cannot be used to prove that his travel ban order was an attempt to discriminate against Muslims, it could create a dangerous precedent.
The US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit affirms a district court ruling against the administration's efforts to deny federal grants to sanctuary jurisdictions.
But dumb, offensive speech still isn't violence.
He wants to keep them in the kitchen with their "involuntary housewife visa"
A new Cato Institute study finds that screening of visitors, immigrants, and refugees is about as thorough as can reasonably be expected.
But it's a great game for gringos and Mexicans alike.
A bill in the California senate could legalize street vending across the state.
He should stop gutting America's refugee program.
The two justices face off in Sessions v. Dimaya.
The Supreme Court rules against the federal government in Sessions v. Dimaya.
Backpage CEO Carl Ferrer turned over the company and seven other executives in exchange for leniency.
Indictment reveals money-laundering, conspiracy charges, and a tricky federal law known as the Travel Act.
How will Trump and new national security adviser John Bolton respond to a reported chemical attack in a war-ravaged country?
The various lawsuits pitting the Trump administration against sanctuary jurisdictions has important implications for constitutional federalism that go beyond immigration policy.
Site had long been a target for sex work and sex trafficking advertisements.
5 editorials call for the federal government to thwart Sinclair's expansion efforts in wake of creepy promo video; meanwhile you can count the number of anti-FOSTA eds on one finger
The Trump administration is wasting time, money, and people by sending National Guard members to the U.S.-Mexico border.
Border Patrol guards average just two illegal-immigrant apprehensions per month; they don't need reinforcements.
If the president sends active-duty Army troops to the border without congressional approval, he will be acting in violation of federal law.
He is trashing the First Amendment to stifle the immigrant rights movement.
The ruling allows a civil suit against Backpage to proceed for one of the case's three plaintiffs.
Only a man with a big heart can dump on foreign workers while enjoying their services.
The brief, which I coauthored on behalf of myself and six other legal scholars explains why the Bill of Rights constrains federal power over immigration no less than other types of federal power.
A higher non-response rate among illegal immigrants is a goal to be celebrated, not some minor potential side effect to be lamented, Kris Kobach, David Vitter, and other would-be gerrymanderers stress.
The Trump administration is violating the rule of law in the name of upholding it.
Even our restrictionist president has yet to go full Romney.
The Census Bureau's decision to ask about citizenship in its decennial survey for the first time since 1950 will lead to worse data, but better electoral results for Republicans.
While America gawks at tales of consensual Trump-spanking, Internet freedom is coming under legislative and cultural attack
The wall might turn out "big" and "beautiful." But how much will it cost, and what will it do?
The president wants his border wall funding.
The great content crackdown has begun.
The measure will "make it harder, not easier, to root out and prosecute sex traffickers," said Sen. Ron Wyden, one of only two senators to vote no on FOSTA.
An ICE spokesman resigning because he "didn't feel like fabricating the truth" should be a wake-up call about the White House's factually untethered approach to immigration policy.
The president's wall promise rests on the same basis as a Ponzi scheme.
The Constitution prevents the feds from commandeering state and local officials.
A California mayor issued a public warning of an ICE raid earning the administration's wrath
The president is touting a study that underestimates the wall's cost by a wide margin.
This is one of the questions that may well arise in Jeff Sessions' new lawsuit against California's sanctuary laws.
Immigration, federalism, and the 10th Amendment
The Justice Department wants to block three laws that it says hamper immigration enforcement.
Reason editors dispute presidential notion that "trade wars are good, and easy to win," and also argue over the Oscars.
Device makers would be required to block porn, prostitution hubs, and all content that fails "current standards of decency."
Disney allegedly lobbied against the bill behind the scenes.
Indefinite detention carried the day in Jennings v. Rodriguez, but the ruling affirms an important principle that may eventually kill the practice.
El Paso Democrat, trying to change Texas from red to blue, talks about guns, weed, and how we've already got "record safety and security on our border"
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks