The Government Seized This Innocent Man's Car Without Due Process. SCOTUS Won't Hear the Case.
"How can an ordinary person afford to wait years after the government takes their car?"
"How can an ordinary person afford to wait years after the government takes their car?"
The Institute for Justice wants the Supreme Court to rule that the Fifth Amendment requires a prompt post-seizure hearing.
In two-thirds of those cases, there were no accompanying arrests.
It's almost like Americans are paying for them, and like Trump doesn't actually believe in free trade.
Apparently, conservatives believe in states' rights, except when they don't.
Plus: Rudy Giuliani threatens to sue The Swamp, UPS gets approval for delivery drones, and more...
"I want her to come here to take care of me. Because I need her," she said.
The agency is mum on how many people are impacted
Tameika Lovell says the search violated her Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights.
Civil import violations carry penalties tied to either the value of the article itself or to the taxes you would have been assessed if you'd declared it.