ICE's Plan To Kick Out Foreign Students Is Chilling
The Trump administration is using the pandemic to rid the country of foreigners
The Trump administration is using the pandemic to rid the country of foreigners
ICE's recent decision to bar foreign students enrolled at universities with online-only classes is the tip of the iceberg of a much larger problem.
"Supreme Court jurisprudence...is heavily weighted against you," an appeals judge told state prosecutors last week.
The Trump administration might be setting the stage to eject foreign techies who've played by every immigration rule.
The legislation cuts lots of red tape surrounding the visa process.
Can the government compel speech? For Supreme Court justices, that seems to depend on the content of that speech.
In the video, I also make the case for extending the same rights to other victims of Chinese government oppression.
It would be smart foreign policy and beneficial to the U.S. economy.
The article explains why these policies, which made made America more closed to immigration than at any previous time in history, are both harmful and a dangerous executive power grab.
Conservative legal commentator and experienced religious liberties litigator David French explains why.
Fourth in a series of posts based on my new book "Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom."
Banning foreign workers will result in the outsourcing of jobs from America.
Third in a series of posts based on my new book "Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom."
Donald Trump has rewritten much of U.S. immigration law from the Oval Office, without congressional oversight or public debate.
Most immigrants, even more than many natives, viscerally appreciate America, because they know what it's like to live in an unfree country.
The event includes questions and commentary by Northwestern University law Professor John McGinnis
Professor Christopher Walker explores a potential wrinkle in the DACA decision.
Professor Zach Price on the Chief Justice Roberts' Decision in Dept. of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California
The Introduction summarizes the book's argument and provides an outline of the chapters that follow.
The decision is only a temporary reprieve for DACA recipients, and still permits Trump or a future president to repeal the program if he is willing to pay the political price of doing so.
In what appears to be a quite narrow ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts holds that if Trump wants to get rid of DACA, he'll have to try again.
The first in a series of posts based on my book "Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom"
Trump is caught in a trap of his own making.
Plus: The U.S. Supreme Court stops an execution at the last minute, a senator argues that you shouldn't get HBO GO for free, and more...
The ruling is yet another setback for the administration, though legal battles over sanctuary jurisdictions will continue.
It is now available for preorder, and will be delivered by June 23.
The event will include commentary by Prof. John McGinnis (Northwestern).
It is now up on his Balkinization blog.
Professor Balkin asked me many great questions in interview just published at his Balkinization blog.
In it I explain how to reform a federal law the Supreme Court has interpreted as giving the president nearly unlimited power to ban migrants from entering the United States.
In the age of coronavirus, they are a danger to the lives of people both inside them and outside.
Audio of podcasts with Vanderblit philosophy Prof. Robert Talisse, for the New Books Network, and University of Kentucky law Prof. Brian Frye's Ipse Dixit podcast series.
It was business as usual for federal prosecutors.
One of the internet's most prominent libertarian blogs ends its run. But many of the contributors will continue write elsewhere.
China's growing crackdown on Hong Kong has inspired calls for the West to allow Hong Kongers to migrate here. They should indeed be allowed to do so - and the same right should be extended to other victims of Chinese government oppression.
Amazon Prime Video's latest feature is a smartly made indie sci-fi film from an incredibly promising first-time director.
And it should keep taking Chinese college students too. Both strategies would be more damaging to China than the current plan of using sanctions.
The right's response to the coronavirus lockdowns brings out a longstanding American paradox.
The talk is sponsored by the Oxford Hayek Society and Students for Liberty UK. But anyone anywhere in the world can watch and ask questions - for free!
The video was produced by the Institute for Humane Studies, and goes over some key themes of the book.
This preposterous claim is front and center in a new PragerU video.
Videos of interviews by political commentator Amy Peikoff and immigration lawyer Nathan Brown.
The symposium, which includes a contribution from me, reviews important new books on secession by Timothy William Waters and Frank Buckley.
In "Operation Asian Touch," federal agents coerced suspected human-trafficking victims into sex acts. Local cops seized money and threw them in jail.
His mixed immigration record might be good for a Republican, but it's not exactly impressive for a Libertarian.
Is COVID-19 bringing the mythology of America as a nation of immigrants to an end? Q&A with The New York Times' Jia Lynn Yang
Center for Immigration Studies' Mark Krikorian debates George Mason University economist Bryan Caplan on immigration and coronavirus.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks