Donald Trump Just Demonstrated the Value of Birthright Citizenship
The next Folarin Balogun could be in a field that matters much more than a soccer pitch. America should not handicap its access to such talent.
The next Folarin Balogun could be in a field that matters much more than a soccer pitch. America should not handicap its access to such talent.
Videos of my interviews with C-SPAN and Fox 10 Phoenix.
The 6-3 decision is right, and a contrary ruling would have had horrific effects.
A new memo from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services would require green card applicants to apply for permanent residency abroad—but the law it cites may say the opposite.
Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd and other Florida law enforcement leaders say they'd rather be focusing on immigrants who are committing crimes.
Professor Michael Ramsey revisits the original public meaning of the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause.
Department of Homeland Security
It's the punch line to a bad joke that started 20 years ago when Congress passed the REAL ID Act.
The justices grant certiorari before judgment in one of the two cases challenging the Trump Administration's attempt to narrow birthright citizenship via executive order.
The case of Leo Garcia Venegas, a U.S. citizen arrested twice by immigration enforcement, demonstrates the problem with the government's current strategy.
Yes, but only if they intend to relinquish it (or, if they are naturalized citizens and committed fraud during the naturalization process).
The 1866 debate over birthright citizenship included a debate over immigration.
Briefs urging the Supreme Court to stay injunctions against the order challenge "the conventional wisdom" about the meaning of an 1898 decision interpreting the 14th Amendment.
Plus: Pell Grant fraud, New York mayoral candidate defaulting on student loans, and more...
Columbia student Mohsen Mahdawi thought he was going to become an American. Instead, ICE whisked him away into detention.
If nationwide injunctions were okay against other administrations, the Fourth Circuit see no reason they are not okay now.
The first of what may be many appellate rulings on the Trump Administration's most controversial and questionable Executive Order.
Why their response to me and other critics fails to refute key objections.
Their argument for denying birthright citizenship to children of undocumented immigrants born in the US has multiple weaknesses, including that it would also have denied it to former slaves.
Federal judges in Washington and Maryland say the president's attack on birthright citizenship flouts the 14th Amendment and 127 years of judicial precedent.
Immigration experts Alex Nowrasteh and Bryan Caplan make the case for significantly more and easier immigration to the U.S.
The executive order contradicts the 14th Amendment and 127 years of judicial precedent.
The state superintendent says the measure isn't intended to discourage undocumented parents from sending their kids to school. That's hard to believe.
Former Rep. Justin Amash explains why President Donald Trump's interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment is wrong.
The arguments are not new. The willingness of an Administration to act on them are.
The TRO blocks the order for 14 days and is a sign that courts are highly skeptical of Trump's position.
Legal scholars Amanda Frost and Paul Gowder have both published notable new articles on the subject.
The executive order that the president-elect plans to issue contradicts the historical understanding of the 14th Amendment.
My new Just Security article explains why denying birthright citizenship to children of undocumented immigrants would be unconstitutional.
So an Eleventh Circuit panel tentatively concludes, preliminarily enjoining the statute; one judge would hold that the limits violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Plus: A listener asks if there is any place libertarians can go to start their own country or city state.
What Swift v. Tyson has to say to The Slaughter-House Cases
Some scholars and commentators argue that legacy preferences at public universities are unconstitutional because they are a form of hereditary privilege. If so, the same is likely true of the far more consequential hereditary privilege of citizenship that severely restricts the right to live and work in the United States.
Maria Elena Reimers has been caught in legal limbo for years.
Just consider the policies that the Founding Fathers embraced.
A Government Accountability Office report last year documented hundreds of ICE actions involving potential U.S. citizens.
A comment by Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas highlights a longstanding pernicious fallacy.
Canadian officials recognize that immigrants are key to the post-COVID economic recovery. The U.S. should take note.
The U.S. is still facing a worker shortage. Why keep willing workers away from jobs?
55 percent of Americans say they favor providing a "pathway to citizenship" for undocumented immigrants and 56 percent say that simplifying the process for legal immigration is the best way to reduce illegal immigration.
The previous administration had made some reasonable changes, but also introduced questions based on factual errors and questionable normative assumptions smuggled in under the guise of factual knowledge.
Plus: Legal cannabis workers now outnumber electrical engineers in the U.S., Portland cops defend dumpsters from hungry people, and more...
Judge Rao writes an opinion rejecting all claims in equity, among other things
He has done everything in his power to stop immigrants from gaining citizenship.
In 2003, the prominent conservative Republican senator proposed an amendment that would have eliminated the requirement that the president be a "natural born citizen."
The ridiculous controversy over Kamala Harris' eligibility to be Vice President reinforces the point.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.