On Memorial Day, Remember Skepticism Toward a Large, Standing Military
Thank the troops, but question the uses to which they’re put.
Thank the troops, but question the uses to which they’re put.
"I am currently very afraid," an interpreter tells Reason. "I...have no doubt that I will be targeted and get killed."
President Biden signed a bill Monday that temporarily waives the regulation. Why not just repeal the law?
Neither side needs military aid funded by U.S. taxpayers.
Three reasons to be skeptical about Evan McMullin's latest political initiative.
The study comes as House Democrats press to completely abolish the Pentagon program.
The protectionist Jones Act makes it harder to move fuel around the country.
With depressing job reports, why not eliminate more laws that keep people from doing jobs they want to do and people want to pay them to do?
A significant portion of the world views the U.S. as a threat to democracy in their home countries.
After pressure from immigration advocates, he decided to honor a promise he had previously backtracked on. This is a positive development, but much more needs to be done.
Plus: SPCA sues for First Amendment rights of pet owners and veterinarians, an epic antitrust battle between Apple and Fortnite's parent company begins, and more...
The president reneged on that promise last month. People weren't happy.
We’ll have to pay attention this time to ensure a conclusion to the accidental forever war.
55 percent of Americans say they favor providing a "pathway to citizenship" for undocumented immigrants and 56 percent say that simplifying the process for legal immigration is the best way to reduce illegal immigration.
It's long since past time to separate accurate geopolitical language from military interventionism.
These rules drive up costs and distort markets while letting politicians claim credit for defending domestic industries from foreign competition.
A Chavez-style socialist is the leading contender to become the nation's next president.
The new administration has done much good. But it has also broken key promises.
His explanation makes little sense.
AMC+ thriller takes viewers to paranoid, dangerous '60s Berlin.
After nearly 20 years, America's longest war could soon be over. But delaying withdrawal for what seems like symbolic reasons is questionable.
The nation's brief respite from military rule came to an abrupt end on February 1.
Joe Biden doesn’t have to feel bad about bringing the troops home if he lets the persecuted come here.
As France fell to Nazi Germany, America's elites glanced nervously eastward and began to envision the U.S. as the new defender of global order.
Many U.S. complaints about China aren’t about actions that threaten U.S. security.
Plus: Facebook joins the fight against Section 230, court says no right to bear arms outside home, and more...
Here's a better idea: Abolish the "Selective" Service.
By playing with definitions, the military is able to keep more troops in Afghanistan than it publicly reports.
After losing at the Supreme Court in 2019, state lawmakers are now targeting fulfillment houses in an attempt to stop consumers from buying what they want.
I argue that the recent air strike was legal, but overall US military intervention in Syria still lacks required congressional authorization. Biden may be trying to change that; but history gives reason for skepticism.
This initiative might help restore congressional control over war authorization. But there is reason for skepticism that it will pan out.
Just keep an eye on the small print. The wars might officially end while still allowing inappropriate military meddling.
The country just gave almost 2 million Venezuelans a pathway to citizenship.
The strike was probably legal (as were similar small-scale strikes by Trump). But there are serious constitutional problems with the overall US military presence in Syria.
Big outlets get subsidies. The government still gets to pick winners and losers.
Samuel Cummings built a global weapons empire in Washington, D.C.'s shadow.
Anne-Marie Slaughter hasn’t given up on intervention and the “responsibility to protect” doctrine.
President Joe Biden's promised return to normality will unfortunately extend to his administration's foreign policy.
The protagonist's speedy evolution into an anti–Cold Warrior is the better subplot.
Reimplementing 10 percent tariffs on aluminum imported from the United Arab Emirates for vacuous national security reasons only entrenches executive authority over trade.
What should come next for the U.S.-Saudi Arabia relationship
The United States will accept 125,000 refugees in the fiscal year that begins on October 1, up from the current record low level of 15,000 set by the Trump administration.
The Biden administration should take advantage of the opportunity to cut our losses instead of continuing the forever war.
We have an agreement to pull out by May. We should honor it regardless of the state of the country.
The U.S. has an interest in protecting its political system from manipulation by foreign enemies or their paid agents. But treason and espionage are already illegal, as is bribery.
Pandering to maritime unions means higher costs and harsher lives for coastal minority populations.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks