Peculiar Religious Discrimination
A charter school seeking contractors to provide art instruction can't exclude companies just because their web site has religious references.
A charter school seeking contractors to provide art instruction can't exclude companies just because their web site has religious references.
Conservative legal commentator and experienced religious liberties litigator David French explains why.
The Equality Act would significantly expand government power and it also threatens religious freedom.
As SCOTUS declines to issue an injunction, the chief justice says the state's COVID-19 control measures seem consistent with the First Amendment.
The cap (25% of capacity or at most 100 people) also generally applies to secular gatherings, but not to various commercial establishments.
Supreme Court precedent suggests COVID-19 restrictions that discriminate against churches are presumptively unconstitutional.
They’re still not being treated the same as secular places of gathering, so a legal challenge continues.
I'd love to hear your thoughts about this draft brief.
A short majority opinion, and a long dissent.
If the Mall of America can reopen on June 1, why can’t the Cathedral of St. Paul?
Allowing schools and malls to reopen, but not places of worship, would raise civil rights issues
at least when they specifically target religious institutions, and not similar secular entities.
Can the Supreme Court draw the line?
While governments are shutting down religious services and fining pastors who defy those orders.
So a Maryland appellate court held last month, I think quite correctly (and consistently with the broad trend in other states):
The Obamacare contraception mandate continues to cause legal trouble.
The court concludes that it likely violates the Kentucky Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Free Exercise Clause, chiefly because the Governor's order has many exceptions for various allowed services.
On the same day Brooklyn’s Hasidic Jews came out for a funeral, hundreds were gathering elsewhere in New York City to watch a military flyover.
While denying Donald Trump's dictatorial impulses, William Barr notes that public health emergencies do not give governments unlimited powers.
A federal judge defended religious freedom by blocking a misguided ban on drive-in Easter services.
So holds a New York appellate court.
Did Louisville actually purport to ban drive-in church services, or was it just asking people to voluntarily refrain? And what notice did the City have about the temporary restraining order request?
Plus: Signal will leave the U.S. market if EARN IT passes, Justin Amash blasts Michigan shutdown orders, and more...
If people are allowed to go to bars, restaurants, libraries, schools, and factories (with suitable social distancing), should they also be allowed to go to church?
A federal judge blocks the Louisville ban on drive-in church services.
A "drafting snafu" with the Legislature's concurring resolution, which endorsed the Governor's initial emergency order, is casting many things in doubt.
That violates the Mississippi Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and probably the freedom of assembly and association.
The annual retelling of the Exodus story reminds us not to take freedom for granted.
My guess is that these are quite unusual, but still noteworthy.
Religious liberty, public health, and the police powers of the states
I'll say it again: "Trust in Allah, but tie your camel."
... for violating New York City ban on gatherings of 50 people or more.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10