Bill Clinton's Shameful Crime Politics: Watch Matt Welch Talk to Al Sharpton Sunday at 8 a.m. ET
MSNBC's PoliticsNation will feature some blunt talk about New York politics
MSNBC's PoliticsNation will feature some blunt talk about New York politics
Clinton minimizes her role in advocating longer sentences and exaggerates her role in trying to shorten them.
She acknowledges harsher penalties implemented in the '90s were a mistake.
It's true, if you don't count Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Rick Perry, or Jim Webb
The former president can't decide whether he should brag about the 1994 law or apologize for it.
The former president says Republicans made him support longer sentences, which were a necessary response to 13-year-old murderers "hopped up on crack."
Election year posturing and new Supreme Court nominee fight push it down the agenda.
Obama has granted about 1 percent of commutation petitions, compared to Nixon's 7 percent.
These flawed laws need to be reformed.
A big backlog of prisoners seeking shorter sentences has gotten a lot bigger.
The law of the last antecedent beats the law of lenity.
The former attorney general supported mandatory minimums for drug offenses as a federal prosecutor in the 1990s.
A "new face of heroin" is changing the discourse on drug addicts in the media. But has it translated into more humane public policy? Not quite.
Clinton, who was for mass incarceration before she was against it, fills in some blanks in her agenda.
Opponents of sentencing reform say a triple murder in Columbus means drug war prisoners must remain behind bars.
If Obama means what he says about unjust punishment, he will free Weldon Angelos.
Because some drug offenders are violent, four senators argue, all of them should stay behind bars.
The Kentucky senator encouraged his fellow Republicans to be more consistently skeptical of big government.
Watered down improvements to federal mandatory minimums may get watered down further.
Jack Weinstein concludes that the penalty recommended by federal sentencing guidelines is far too severe.
The Texas senator, once a leading Republican advocate of sentencing reform, seems to have abandoned the cause.
The Texas senator, once a leading Republican critic of disproportionate punishment, seems to have switched sides.
Why is Cruz, a critic of disproportionate penalties, trying to sink the bill with the best chance of passing?
Need another reason to resent the GOP-run Congress? Try Tom Cotton (and Ted Cruz).
Jane Mayer implies their interest in the issue is new while conceding it is not.
The resentencing of Dwight and Steven Hammond illustrates the injustices wrought by mandatory minimums.
The Hammond case illustrates how federal law forces judges to impose sentences they consider grossly disproportionate.
A federal judge rejected mandatory minimums for Dwight and Steven Hammond as unconstitutional; an appeals court disagreed.
Obama's commutation record looks good in absolute numbers but paltry as a percentage of petitions.
Families Against Mandatory Minimum's Kevin Ring makes the case for even more wide-ranging and far-reaching sentencing reform.
A bipartisan consensus produces a bill that's better than reformers feared but worse than they hoped.
A new law enforcement group favors abolishing mandatory minimums, changing felonies to misdemeanors, and winnowing down petty offenses.
Large majorities of Democrats and Republicans would abolish mandatory minimums for nonviolent offenses.
Is reducing prison terms reckless in light of drug and crime trends?
Bipartisan bills could help free Weldon Angelos and thousands of other drug offenders.
The sentence reductions in both bills are nevertheless a major improvement.
Bills backed by the chairmen of the House and Senate judiciary committees could help free thousands of drug offenders.
Beginning at the end of the month, some 6,000 drug offenders will get out earlier than originally expected.
The bill could let thousands of current prisoners get out sooner than expected and reduce future injustices.
At the insistence of the powerful senator, a new bill shortens fewer sentences and lengthens others.
Will fearmongering force back the opportunity to scale back laws?
At stake: Possessing a firearm during a "crime of violence" adds five extra years to a felony sentence.
Former prosecutor Bill Otis has been mistaken over and over again when advising legislators against reducing drug sentences.
Looking at pictures should not be treated like a violent crime.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10