House Sentencing Reform Bill, Like the Senate Version, Makes Some Penalties Harsher
The sentence reductions in both bills are nevertheless a major improvement.
The sentence reductions in both bills are nevertheless a major improvement.
Bills backed by the chairmen of the House and Senate judiciary committees could help free thousands of drug offenders.
Beginning at the end of the month, some 6,000 drug offenders will get out earlier than originally expected.
The bill could let thousands of current prisoners get out sooner than expected and reduce future injustices.
At the insistence of the powerful senator, a new bill shortens fewer sentences and lengthens others.
Will fearmongering force back the opportunity to scale back laws?
At stake: Possessing a firearm during a "crime of violence" adds five extra years to a felony sentence.
Former prosecutor Bill Otis has been mistaken over and over again when advising legislators against reducing drug sentences.
Looking at pictures should not be treated like a violent crime.
The arbitrary decision that greatly magnified the penalties he faces
His sentence could have been much longer under federal law (and much shorter under state law).
Potential harsh discipline for absurd reasons.
After 21 years behind bars, a nonviolent drug offender gets parole.
Congress should listen to Alex Kozinski and ignore federal prosecutors.
Don't let the Left own this issue. They've been terrible.
And other lousy arguments against sentencing reform.
After 2010 reforms, crack use fell along with prosecutions and penalties.
We're both winning and losing the drug war, so don't change anything!
He emphasizes the importance of making shorter sentences retroactive.
The guidelines were always too lenient.
When mercy gets in the way of ambition.
Dionne Wilson joined Sen. Rand Paul and a bipartisan roster of lawmakers and advocates at yesterday's "Fair Justice" summit in D.C.
According to John Walters, all drug offenders are violent.
The president can do much more to correct unjust sentences, but time is running out.
The SAFE Justice Act gets a boost from the House speaker.
The president still thinks drug offenders belong behind bars.
The president joins the Kentucky senator in calling for sentencing reform.
Record does not suggest support for the 'Right on Crime' movement.
This is a promising and positive step in the right direction, but real reform is still needed.
If correcting clear injustices is the aim, Obama can do a lot more.
Louisiana's marijuana laws, among the harshest in the country, become a bit less harsh.
The SAFE Justice Act tackles overcriminalization and overfederalization.
The presumptive Democratic nominee wants to do something about mandatory minimums but won't say what.
Court will be able to depart from guidelines on some drug cases.
After 21 years in prison, Jeff Mizanskey is eligible for parole.
A suspended sentence for a $40 crack sale + a probation violation = two decades in prison.
Gives judges more leeway for alternatives in some situations.
Excessive PDA, excessive sentencing
The former secretary of state glides over her own role in promoting overincarceration.
The presumptive Democratic presidential nominee promoted the overincarceration she now condemns.
The Republican presidential candidate notes the need to "undo some of the harm inflicted by the Clinton administration."
"I don't know all the answers," the presumptive Democratic nominee confesses.
Aren't Democrats supposed to be more enlightened on this issue?
Loretta Lynch's lack of enthusiasm could make it harder to pass a decent bill.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks