Panama Papers Previews What Donald Trump's Jacksonian Economics Would Look Like
When the biggest economy on the block gets to write the global rules, foreigners and regular Americans get screwed, elites skate, and hypocrisy rules the day.
When the biggest economy on the block gets to write the global rules, foreigners and regular Americans get screwed, elites skate, and hypocrisy rules the day.
Ruling establishes that people have expectation of physical location privacy.
The two switch sides in the request for access, but the underlying issues are the same.
The fight over government access to your private data will not be ending anytime soon.
The FBI says a mysterious "outside party" has found a way to unlock San Bernardino shooter Syed Farook's iPhone without assistance from Apple.
In the 11th hour, feds ask to delay court hearing over access to terrorist's work phone.
Accusing Apple of "hyperbole" is pretty ballsy...and utterly wrongheaded.
Also contend some of their work is 'classified'
Americans have the right to privacy and security of their digital data.
Nobody believes it's 'just one phone.'
He wants a commission to figure out how to protect our privacy and still allow us to go after the bad guys.
Secure communications for me, but not for thee.
The new surveillance rules have nothing to do with stopping terrorism.
Among other things, Apple alleges that the FBI violates its First Amendment rights by compelling company engineers to write code.
Big names in tech file briefs in support.
Maryland legislators want to limit the use of listening devices on public buses.
School administrators say she should have password-protected the phone.
Judiciary Committee members understand the precedent involved.
Federal officials can't keep their own secrets. Would you really trust them with the ability to access yours?
Says government has overstepped bounds
The 6-to-1 ruling says it's unconstitutional to punish people for withdrawing "implied consent."
The stories of yesterday provide hints for the lawmakers of tomorrow.
This is why you shouldn't accept the FBI's 'just one phone' decryption argument.
The national security whistleblower talks to the Free State Project from an undisclosed location in Russia.
The DOJ has persuaded a judge to issue a search warrant for a thing that does not exist, by forcing Apple to create a key that the FBI is incapable of creating.
Kennedy and Matt Welch defend Apple against the FBI
It's possible that the FBI is not primarily concerned with the particular evidence stored on the San Bernardino shooter's phone at all.
Would the government really limit itself to just this one terrorist iPhone? Tune into Kennedy on Fox Business Network; replay at midnight
The talking points insist this Apple case is an isolated incident. Evidence suggests otherwise.
Cases involving drug prohibition reveal the late justice's fickle fidelity to the Fourth Amendment and federalism.
The stick has been suggested. Now where is the carrot?
This seemingly simple demand opens a massive can of extremely dangerous worms.
Which side are you on? Government spies or corporate guardians?
Consider Sen. Tom Cotton and Rep. Justin Amash and guess which is which.
Harvard and other elites take aim at any possibility of financial privacy in the name of curbing criminals flashing their big cash.
Company will not compromise user security to help access terrorist's phone.
The late Supreme Court justice was inaccurately described as "authoritarian."
Legislation would require warrants for old communications.
Whoops! The mandatory unmanned aerial vehicle database is public and searchable.
Turning journalistic deception into legal matter can have a chilling effect.
It seems that every week, more information comes to light about Clinton's grave legal woes.
The investigative journalism outfit launches hidden service website on the encrypted Tor Browser.
We can blame last summer's Office of Personnel Management hack on good, old-fashioned bureaucratic incompetence-not a lack of CISA-style "information sharing."
The Apple CEO has become an outspoken defender of privacy rights.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks