The Department of Homeland Security Turns 20. Its Legacy Is Disastrous.
Surveilling American citizens without due process, separating undocumented children from their parents, the TSA—the DHS has been a failure.
Surveilling American citizens without due process, separating undocumented children from their parents, the TSA—the DHS has been a failure.
"No one buys this sham of a review," wrote one critic. "And the reason we don't buy it is because we all have functioning brains."
A new survey from FIRE reveals rampant illiberalism and self-censorship among young faculty.
Historian Jeff Guinn's account focuses on the ATF's oft-overlooked fiasco in the 1993 affair rather than the FBI's widely reported involvement.
Plus: The editors reveal their favorite issues and articles from the Reason magazine catalog.
A New York Times story about the state's location-specific gun bans glosses over the vast territory they cover.
The Supreme Court split on this 4-4 in 1982, and the matter remains unsettled.
and thus not being able to safely participate in BDSM activities (presumably on the dominant side)?
Officials shield government abuses from litigation by claiming “national security.” The Supreme Court declined to weigh in.
Right now, Hongkongers have lost their avenues to speak because of the national security law imposed by the new government.
The Court’s decisions in Gonzalez and subsequent cases could lead to impossible, incompatible consequences.
Florida's H.B. 999 claims to support "viewpoint diversity" and "intellectual rigor." It does just the opposite.
It’s already illegal to expose minors to obscenity, so what is this bill really for?
by Prof. Peter de Marneffe (Ariz. State).
When society criminalizes outdoor independence, it makes smart phone addiction more likely.
It's a threat to our fundamental rights, but courts refuse to change their approach.
"The current law is that parents have a right to direct the education of their child,'' said the bill's sponsor. "And this is a parents' rights state.''
There can be no freedom of association without the freedom to disassociate from views you find erroneous, dangerous, or repulsive.
"The bill is an aggressive and blatantly unconstitutional attempt to rewrite defamation law in a manner that protects the powerful from criticism by journalists and the public," said one attorney.
The mystery writer and cultural critic is an outspoken defender of free thinking and cultural appropriation.
Plus: The U.S. Supreme Court considers another internet free speech case, the Department of Transportation pushes expensive new rail regs, and more...
The Fox Business host stood out as a champion of the baroque conspiracy theory that implicated Dominion Voting Systems in election fraud.
Plus: the editors field a listener question on intellectual property.
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook on Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion of the decentralized protocol Nostr with NVK, Damus app creator Will Casarin, Nick Gillespie, and Zach Weissmueller.
Let Augustus Gloop be fat.
After a tragic on-set accident, a district attorney used a law passed after the incident to threaten Baldwin with years in jail.
The statute required no-boycott-of-Israel terms in Arkansas government contracts; the Eighth Circuit had held that the law doesn't violate the First Amendment.
Politicians in Syria, Turkey, and the United States are getting in the way of relief efforts.
Plus: The National Endowment for Democracy ends funding of conservative media blacklist, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear major internet free speech case, and more...
The El Paso incident from a few days ago, the FBI 2021 statistics, and more.
Section 230 helped the internet flourish. Now its scope is under scrutiny.
War by Other Means tells the story of those conscientious objectors who did not cooperate with the government's alternative-service schemes.
"[P]ublic access is designed not only to allow the press and the public to follow high-profile cases, but also to permit ongoing and future access. Law students or legal scholars review case files for law review articles, attorneys review past cases when similar litigation arises, and litigation may be a source of information for policy-makers considering, for example, safety regulations or for journalists reporting more broadly on either the courts or the subject matter of particular litigation."
The University of Washington thus wasn't barred by the First Amendment from disclosing such names in response to a People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals public records request.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10