Secret Litigation Over Secret City Council Records
A very unusual Wisconsin case.
"If this were a legal proceeding, many (if not all) of the members of the [Senate Judiciary Committee] would have to recuse themselves."
There are lots of reasons to be concerned about government snooping, but how should we feel when private companies do it?
"You got the wrong address. Don't shoot my daughter."
A woman's case against the defendants who arranged the prosecution (a police department captain, who was her ex-husband and the target of her speech, and his friend who was a police investigator) can go forward.
The head of Ideas Beyond Borders is translating books by Steven Pinker, Sam Harris, and others into Arabic and distributing them for free.
When she did post such a photo, she was arrested and prosecuted -- a remarkable case from two years ago, which I just learned about.
More on their unconstitutionality.
The government may not discriminate against businesses because of the political views the business (or its spokesman) has expressed.
The protesters may have broken the law, but two nights behind bars is a bit much.
Inviting followers to harass this man violates the platform's terms of service.
What happens when autonomous machines have "to choose between various shades of wrong?" A Q&A with defense analyst Paul Scharre.
And the guidelines for spying on journalists may be even looser under Trump.
The perils of poorly sourced stories
The Supreme Court's decision in Tinker is viewed as the high-water mark for students' First Amendment rights, but Justice Black's strident dissent-not the majority-spoke for most Americans at the time.
Online platforms will be subjected to a costly, easily-abused system that will likely pull down legal content.
"Solutions won't come from new laws from Washington, D.C., or from a speech police at the U.S. Department of Education."
His enterprising operation illustrates the valuable role porous borders play in undermining restrictive laws.
How should we feel about conscience-based discrimination?
The nation that gave the world John Milton and his cry for the "liberty to utter" is now at the forefront of shutting speech down.
The controversy might be two years old, but that didn't stop the Reno City Council from weighing in.
An NRA spokesperson correctly says marijuana is not "germane" to Jean's death but keeps bringing it up when discussing Castile's.
Since his whistleblowing, the United Kingdom has granted itself even more power to snoop on citizens.
Sen. Kamala Harris tried to limit the storefront speech of firearms sellers as California attorney general.
The Supreme Court nominee talks warrantless government surveillance with Sen. Patrick Leahy.
End of a Jim Crow-era law a potential win for jury nullification.
Clinton runs with a Kamala Harris whopper that's already been debunked.
Bill also calls for holding forum moderators legally liable for extreme speech.
This time the Libertarian Party seems to be hurting the Democrat, who's trying to run out the clock on confirming Brett Kavanaugh.
The case against Krissy Noble shows how drug and gun laws conspire to deprive people of a fundamental right.
So a federal judge just held.
"Brett Kavanaugh said he would kill Roe v. Wade last week." Except he didn't.
Harris and other Democrats distorted Kavanaugh's comments on birth control to portray him as a religious extremist.
So a Sixth Circuit panel just held, and it also concluded that the statements weren't actionable under Kentucky law.
The next Reason/Soho Forum Debate pits criminologist Gary Kleck against former Brady Center To Prevent Gun Violence President Paul Helmke.
The defendant, Imani Pennant, reportedly said that there's a web site that helps people create such orders.
Demands for government oversight hide opportunism amid rhetoric about safety.
Critiquing an ex-president's warnings about anti-media rhetoric, non-voting, and unelected bureaucrats
An aide for the jailed dissident calls Google's actions "political censorship."
The Sixth Circuit reaffirms this, including for sexual assault accusations, in a case against the University of Michigan; and the court also allows plaintiff to proceed with his claim that the process was biased against him because of his sex.
If credibility is at stake, "the university must give the accused student or his agent an opportunity to cross-examine the accuser."
An interesting new Younger abstention case from the Ninth Circuit, arising in our challenge to Washington's very broad criminal harassment statute.
There are many reasons to be excited about the NFL's return. The national anthem controversy isn't one of them.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks