12 Good Things That Might Happen Today, None of Which Involve Trump or Biden
American voters have the chance to usher in a few libertarian policies this election, courtesy of these state ballot measures.
American voters have the chance to usher in a few libertarian policies this election, courtesy of these state ballot measures.
A new lawsuit says the state's electioneering statutes violate the First Amendment.
The French Revolution has long inspired progressive radicals ready for change at any cost.
The case doesn't make any change in legal doctrine. But it may be intended to send a message to lower courts.
The Court avoids, at least for now, the First Amendment question by instructing the Fifth Circuit to ask the Louisiana Supreme Court to decide whether Louisiana state law even allows negligence liability in the case.
The surveillance whistleblower has a child on the way and little sign a pardon is forthcoming.
Plus: Fate of Texas drive-thru ballots still uncertain, exposure to diverse news sources is up, Oregon may lessen penalties for possessing drugs, and more...
How seriously should we take the threats of protesters who recently built guillotines outside of Jeff Bezos' house?
Kindly Inquisitors author Jonathan Rauch on the never-ending battle to defend free speech
Judge Susan Brnovich said no reasonable person would question her impartiality just because her husband already says they're guilty.
Speech First, a pro-campus-free-speech advocacy group, can go on with its challenge to UT-Austin's speech codes—and the panel strongly suggests those codes (backed by anonymous reporting to the Campus Climate Response Team) are unconstitutional.
Walter Wallace's family says the officers could have defused the situation without using lethal force.
"The Court cannot punish or hold Defendants liable merely for publishing a summary of Plaintiff's disciplinary action and their commentary about that decision."
The National Security Agency arranged for security systems to be secretly compromised. Then the Chinese government allegedly found its way in.
Who could have predicted that intolerable rules won’t be tolerated?
A good illustration of a basic principle: Facts are not protected by copyright.
An interesting new case from Wisconsin.
Privacy is a right, not a “high risk” and “possibly criminal” activity
The state legislature is considering reforms in response to the use of dogs against cooperative suspects.
Prof. Steven Lubet (Northwestern Pritzker School of Law) has an excellent analysis.
Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos on schooling during COVID-19, the future of higher ed, and why her cabinet department probably shouldn't exist at all
So holds the California Court of Appeal, interpreting the California anti-SLAPP statute.
Pretty clearly unconstitutional, it seems to me, whether applied to pro-Trump T-shirts (as in a recently-filed lawsuit) or to other such material.
But the Oregon Court of Appeals rightly reverses.
Including from Above The Law, Jonathan Turley, PopeHat, Simple Justice, TechDirt, Reuters, Bloomberg, L.A. Times, Cleveland Plain Dealer, and more.
Treating free expression like an instrument of power means that the fight is more about who gets punished most when politicians write new restrictions.
The Washington Supreme Court overrules a trial court's order requiring the removal of one such statement; but what should the general rule on this be?
In 2014, more than half of all California wiretaps (and one sixth of all the wiretaps in the U.S.) were authorized by one judge in Riverside County.
Property owners are suing the city for helping far-left activists seize control of their property during the period when it allowed the latter to rule an "autonomous zone" covering 16 blocks in the area.
Officer Saqueta Williams had been on the DA's "Do Not Call [to Testify] List" because of alleged assault during an off-duty incident (as to which she was later acquitted)—she alleges the documentary falsely implied that she was on the list because she was "dirty and dishonest."
Part three in Reason's documentary series, "Cypherpunks Write Code," tells the story of the U.S. government's long battle to keep strong cryptography out of the hands of its citizens
Plus: What Jeffrey Toobin teaches us about Section 230, Wisconsin's Foxconn boondoggle, Breonna Taylor juror speaks out, and more...
"In nearly all civil and criminal litigation ..., one party asserts that the allegations leveled against it by another party are patently false"; but "if the purported falsity of the complaint's allegations were sufficient to seal an entire case, then the law would recognize a presumption to seal instead of a presumption of openness."
Democrats and Republicans agree on that point, although they disagree about what it means in practice.
over allegedly false fact-checking "charging [Owens] with spreading misinformation about the Covid-19 pandemic on the internet in 'an attempt to downplay the severity' of the pandemic."
Plus: Supreme Court won't stop Pennsylvania from counting late ballots, proposed amendment would limit Court to nine justices, and more...
The Reason Roundtable argues over what to do when Twitter prematurely suppresses oppo-dump journalism unfavorable to Democrats, and when politicians respond with retaliatory regulation.
A brief supporting the company's appeal argues that its discussion of pain treatment was constitutionally protected.