Bankers Scouring Porn Sites. Payment Processors Punishing Journalists. Here's How 'Big Finance' Is Chilling Speech
Financial censorship should worry us all, suggests Rainey Reitman in Transaction Denied.
Financial censorship should worry us all, suggests Rainey Reitman in Transaction Denied.
Cars are already spying on drivers. A 2021 law requires manufacturers to install more tracking technology.
Plus: A dicey FISA reauthorization, kingly quips about burning down the White House, the world's narrowest tax breaks, and more...
"[S]tatements made to third parties can be 'directed at' the victim," and thus criminal harassment if they're repeated and likely to cause serious annoyance or distress, "when they are designed to provoke an adverse consequence against the victim."
"Geofence" searches illustrate the perilous combination of modern technology and deference to law enforcement.
When he returned to the White House, Trump vowed to protect free speech from the government. The FCC's latest move against ABC and Disney looks like the opposite.
The panel (by a 2-1 vote) stayed a district court order that, among other things, blocked the newly established escort requirement.
The government wants access to millions of cell phone location histories. The Supreme Court will decide what the Fourth Amendment allows.
But the judge suspends his decision pending appeal, so that the appellate court has "time to consider and decide the merits of this case, absent unnecessary procedural deadlines."
Some states still allow vengeful spouses to sue a third party for destroying their marriages.
The feds have been demanding that tech companies identify the administration's anonymous online critics. That violates the First Amendment.
To justify punishing a legislator for his speech, a FIRE brief notes, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth relies on a Supreme Court precedent that is clearly inapposite.
Sen. Ron Wyden warns that Americans would be “stunned” at how officials have used the law.
and thus presumptively a First Amendment violation (though here the presumption was rebutted by national security interests).
The order came in a peculiar context—a civil lawsuit over the custody of a child born in Afghanistan—but its logic extends further.
Deaths in ICE detention have hit a two-decade high, and allegations of medical neglect and poor conditions continue to surge.
Plus: The war with Iran is raising condom prices, increased legal liability for chatbot advice could backfire, and more...
The wild things are in the nightclubs.
Despite not mentioning abortion in his sermon, Clive Johnston is being charged for trying to "influence" people not to go through with the procedure.
The platform creators filed a lawsuit claiming their First Amendment rights were violated after the Trump administration convinced Apple and Facebook to remove their content.
"Plaintiff is allegedly the target of hurtful, angry, offensive, humiliating, racial, and gender-based hate made in online posts by Defendant's followers. As tempting as it might be to force some civility into the matter by staunching Defendant's speech against Plaintiff through an injunction, doing so would ignore the protections of the First Amendment."
Afroman discusses his free speech court victory, why he thinks he could unite America, and whether he feels pressure to always be high.
No pseudonymity for teacher challenging removal of pride flags from classroom, because his identity had already been disclosed through public records requests.
The briefing is completed on a cert petition presenting the urgent question of whether section 230 immunizes Twitter's knowing possession and distribution of child sex abuse materials.
Silencing "Fighting Bob" details how the government targeted anti-war critics like Sen. Robert La Follette.
The Court's 1963 ruling in Bantam Books v. Sullivan is freshly relevant in light of recent efforts to restrict speech through government intimidation.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.