"People Are Less Interested in Discussion Than Domination"
Wise words from the target of TrapPartyGate.
Wise words from the target of TrapPartyGate.
The verdict was chiefly based on the actions of protesters and arsonists; the Georgia Court of Appeals rejected it, and the Georgia Supreme Court has just refused to rehear the case.
Richard Martinez lost his dream car because of VIN-plate issues prosecutors admit he was "not aware of."
In two opinions issued Monday, the Court gave qualified immunity to several police officers accused of violating the Constitution.
The lawsuit is brought by the group Indigenous People of Biafra, which has been labeled a terrorist group by the Nigerian government.
A forthcoming article of mine in the New York University Journal of Law & Liberty.
Although the affinities between the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms and the Seventh Amendment right to civil jury trial seem strong, there are crucial differences. The first concerns individual accountability and the ability to understand responsibilities; the second concerns the distinction between substantive rights and procedural rights.
A Supreme Court decision against New York's gun control scheme would be a victory for both criminal justice reform and the Second Amendment.
It was unconstitutional to charge Jenna Holm with manslaughter. But the state wanted to protect its own.
Founding realities refute New York’s arguments supporting its gun carry ban.
Whatever this system is, it is not pro-life.
Nancy Pelosi, Elizabeth Warren, and co. insist that the IRS needs to know about $600 bank accounts.
A Cato panel with Judge David Stras (8th Cir.), with some comments from me (on the other side of the Operation Barbarossa front line).
A district court judge found "overwhelming evidence" of Vickers Cunningham's bigotry.
No one is safe from Chappelle's jokes—but also, everyone is safe from Chappelle's jokes.
Former Judge Luttig's arguments are off base.
Court finds that a Canton, Michigan ordinance requiring mitigation for tree removal constitutes an uncompensated taking.
Administrators attempted to force an apology out of a second-year law student whose Federalist Society affiliations and use of the term "trap house" were "triggering" to his peers.
No accountability for government corruption.
Such libel cases aren't easy to win, but sometimes they can indeed be won.
denial of access to government property, even in a "nonpublic forum" or "limited public forum"
The Massachusetts Model was not a carry ban and required aggressive behavior before it applied.
The experience with the Texas Heartbeat Act offers a preview of what that means.
Governments should not design laws and regulations to frustrate judicial review.
With “keyword warrants,” anyone who queries certain terms on search engines will get caught in the surveillance dragnet.
New York takes a long shot at saving its firearm carry ban.
The federal government and police are finding new ways to use drones to invade privacy.
Too often, the government punishes citizens who reveal the state's true behavior to their fellow Americans.
A new short article of mine, calved off my duty-to-take-down-libels article; I'd love to hear feedback, especially suggestions for a clearer title.
The unusually named case is Doe v. Anonymous #1, now pending in Brooklyn state trial court.
New York’s Supreme Court brief on the Second Amendment is flawed.
"When my daughter was 12 she'd walk down the streets of Shanghai to get donuts," says the mom, Megan McMurry.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks