New York's Futile Search for Historical Precedents for its Handgun Carry Restrictions
The Massachusetts Model was not a carry ban and required aggressive behavior before it applied.
The Massachusetts Model was not a carry ban and required aggressive behavior before it applied.
New York takes a long shot at saving its firearm carry ban.
New York’s Supreme Court brief on the Second Amendment is flawed.
The justices robe up for another term.
Young people who came of age after 9/11 aren't snowflakes despite being exposed to a series of catastrophic events and apocalyptic news narratives.
An academic field rife with hostility to private gun ownership now gets to know the address of every California owner of a weapon, a weapon part, or ammo.
"Restrictions on guns in public spaces are appropriate to make public spaces safe for democratic participation."
Plus: ACLU rewrites Ruth Bader Ginsburg, theaters sue over NYC vaccine passports, and more...
The passage of time catches up with a potentially significant gun rights decision.
While libertarians will be inclined to applaud some of the new laws, others exemplify familiar conservative excesses.
By and large, those schemes (like Texas’s SB 8 liability for abortion providers) must be fought by raising the Constitution as a defense in a civil lawsuit—not through preenforcement challenges.
The agency returns to a research area where it has caused much controversy in the past.
Stopping the import of Russian ammo is just pretending to do something noble.
Getting a law passed is not the same thing as getting people to obey.
So holds the Third Circuit, applying intermediate scrutiny to a limit on center-fire rifle shooting and to a requirement that clubs be nonprofit.
The laws require that “individuals purchase a handgun ... within 10 days of obtaining a permit to acquire” (Hawaii law requires such a permit) and that “individuals physically bring their firearm to the police department for in-person inspection and registration within five days of acquiring it.”
"Any contrary holding 'would eviscerate Fourth Amendment protections for lawfully armed individuals' by presuming a license expressly permitting possession of a firearm was invalid."
Improve your skills! Bond with the kids! Infuriate control freaks!
The word "pistol," it turns out, is borrowed indirectly from Czech.
“New York enacted its firearm licensing requirements to criminalize gun ownership by racial and ethnic minorities.”
What (if anything) will the courts do once the plaintiffs turn 21?
Ripped for use of excessive force, the Springfield, Massachusetts, Narcotics Bureau is becoming a Firearms Investigation Unit.
Fourth Circuit overturns laws barring licensed gun dealers from selling handguns to 18–20-year-olds.
The panel strikes down the federal statute that bans professional gun dealers from selling handguns to 18-to-20-year-olds.
Eric Adams insists on a double standard that lets former cops like him escape the firearm restrictions everyone else has to follow.
Plus: Trump's absurd lawsuits against social media, states take aim at Google app store, and more...
"The Second Amendment does not exist to protect only the rights of the happy few who distinguish themselves from the body of 'the people' through some 'proper cause.'"
Rhode Island, maybe New York, Wilmington (Delaware), and a few small towns are the only places in the U.S. that still forbid stun guns.
New York's new law seems to conflict with a federal statute that protects manufacturers and dealers from liability for gun crimes.
We can thank judges who were prepared to enforce constitutional limits on public health powers.
Salaythis Melvin's family says they want justice.
The fees would be used to reimburse the city for the public costs of gun violence.
It's likely that soon, almost all Americans will be legally able to carry guns.
What seems like a gun rights case actually presents some important questions of administrative law.
Cracking down on "rogue gun dealers" and enforcing background checks won't stop criminals from arming themselves.
The anti-commandeering principle serves causes favored by both the right and the left.
The Justice Department's proposal encourages states to take away people's Second Amendment rights based on little more than bare allegations.
David Chipman's obfuscation, like the president's vagueness, is aimed at concealing the illogic of targeting firearms based on their "military-style" appearance.
Rules range from absurd to appalling without respect for civil liberties or basic logic.
Biden's Justice Department has some problems with this.
State legislators across the country are working to weaken the enforcement of federal gun laws by emulating immigration activists.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10