Backpage Backed Into Corner Over Adult Ads. Is Government's Goal a Goodbye to Sex Trafficking, or Free Speech?
As Congress puts Backpage on trial, Section 230 is the big fish in this barrel of red herrings.
As Congress puts Backpage on trial, Section 230 is the big fish in this barrel of red herrings.
The president-elect's hostility to critical media is dangerous, not least of which is due to the precedent set by the Obama administration.
The beauty of the First Amendment is that it even protects people who wouldn't protect it.
"It's a sad day for America's children victimized by prostitution," said victims services advocate Lois Lee.
Zineb El Rhazoui doubts Charlie Hebdo still has the "capacity to carry the torch of irreverence and absolute liberty."
One of the most vocal civil libertarians of the past century has died.
The author of We Need to Talk About Kevin and The Mandibles pulls no punches when it comes to race, sex, or economics.
Online outrage may not necessarily mean there's a controversy.
A terrible blow to free speech on campus
Under Mikki Canton's blatantly unconstitutional plan, incivility would be punished by community service.
Google's ad model also targeted by suit, which tries to hold the communications entities responsible for how its users use them.
The Midwest farmer's daughters are not alright.
Colorado campaign finance regulations censor ordinary citizens.
There are consequences for telling professionals what they're legally permitted to talk about.
PEN America's recent report on the state of free speech on college campuses was a robust - yet nuanced - defense of free expression.
The area has previously prosecuted more than a dozen men in 2016 for online speech related to prostitution.
The publisher of the "Mohammed cartoons" and the editor of Reason.com talk about threats to free expression in America and beyond.
Assaults on freedom of speech in Europe and the United States.
A bill aimed at protecting Jewish students from discrimination would have a chilling effect on constitutionally protected speech.
"Congress has spoken on this matter and it is for Congress, not this Court, to revisit."
A review of Judge Sykes's majority opinion in ACLU of Illinois v. Alvarez.
'It's a danger that must be addressed and addressed quickly,' she says for the umpteenth time.
The bill, unanimously approved by the Senate last week, intensifies the conflict between antidiscrimination law and freedom of speech.
Even with free health care and education, some Cubans are still willing to risk their life for free expression.
The billionaire bully chafes at the restrictions imposed by the First Amendment.
Amid European calls for speech crackdown, social media companies introduce tool for easier deletions.
Social-media platforms have not so much "disrupted" the old media gatekeepers as they have introduced a watered-down version of the same concept.
Who says bipartisanism is dead?
Rulings deem Indiana and North Carolina laws unconstitutionally vague and unjustifiably wide.
Maybe Santa should just put everybody on the 'naughty' list and be done with it.
The publisher of the "Mohammed cartoons" and editor of Reason.com talk about threats to expression in politics, culture, and social media.
One parent's objection to deliberately provocative language gets the classic novels 'temporarily' suspended from a Virginia school district.
Bipartisan Senate bill would make "judging Israel by a double standard" a hate crime.
President-elect Donald Trump reignites a long-settled argument.
Would now be a good time for you to chip in a few bucks to our webathon?
The justice Trump admires twice voted to overturn criminal penalties for flag burning, which Clinton later tried to reinstate.
Or maybe spend a year in jail.
Twitter users responded to the Canadian PM's idiotic paean to Castro early and often, showcasing free speech as one of its enemies died.
Constitutional violations abound in Alabama "Human Trafficking Safe Harbor Act."
Progressives should embrace Citizens United, which protects political speech that is often critical of power.
Merkel suggests finding the right kinds of policies that would control that.
How did sites like Breitbart and Red State get included?
"Congress has spoken on this matter and it is for Congress, not this court, to revisit." Except for maybe later this afternoon...
The would-be secretary of state brags about providing material support to a foreign terrorist organization.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks