California Quietly Repeals Restrictions on Doctors' COVID-19 Advice
Several federal judges had expressed skepticism about the constitutionality of penalizing physicians for departing from a government-defined "consensus."
Several federal judges had expressed skepticism about the constitutionality of penalizing physicians for departing from a government-defined "consensus."
"Plaintiff cannot likely show that her rejection of Dr Greeson's alleged conduct was the basis for her asserted adverse educational action (i.e., failure of the Qualifying Exam)—Plaintiff appears to have failed the Qualifying Exam every which way."
The issue was rejected because it "jeopardizes the good order and security of the institution."
The former OnlyFans star and outspoken libertarian defender of sex workers considers the acceleration of government crackdowns on online porn, the sexual revolution, and sex work.
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook at 1 p.m. Eastern this Thursday for a discussion with Aella about the escalating government crackdown on online porn, the sexual revolution, and sex work.
If Facebook et al. are pushing a "radical leftist narrative," why don’t they have a constitutional right to do that?
FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel has initiated a new rulemaking that would enact what are largely the same net neutrality rules tried back in 2016.
The U.S.-Bahraini security pact is the first step towards a future U.S.-Saudi “mega-deal.” Critics say it violates the U.S. Constitution and aids torturers.
Yoel Roth worries about government meddling in content moderation, except when Democrats target "misinformation."
Shielding children from “harm” shouldn’t come at the expense of speech protected by the First Amendment.
The appeals court narrowed a preliminary injunction against such meddling but confirmed the threat that it poses to freedom of speech.
Plus: A listener question concerning porn verification laws.
Plus: Meta revises controversial "dangerous organizations" policy, a win against civil asset forfeiture in Detroit, and more...
There are already people responsible for regulating children’s online activity: parents and guardians.
People should be free to choose how cautious to be. Mask mandates, lockdowns, and closing schools won't stop the virus.
A federal judge compared Waylon Bailey’s Facebook jest to "falsely shouting fire in a theatre."
Porn sites and other online spaces with adult content are fun; they’re also important sources of community and information.
The paper worries that "social media companies are receding from their role as watchdogs against political misinformation."
Plaintiffs in Missouri v. Biden allege that federal pressure to remove and suppress COVID-19 material on Facebook and Twitter violates the First Amendment.
A new study of COVID-19 narratives makes the very mistake it purports to correct.
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook on Thursday at 1:30 p.m. Eastern for a live discussion with Jay Bhattacharya and John Vecchione about their legal case against the Biden administration.
Plus: A listener inquires about the potential positive effects of ranked-choice voting reforms.
The Kids Online Safety Act imposes an amorphous "duty of care" that would compromise anonymous speech and restrict access to constitutionally protected content.
The legislation is also terrible on free speech and poses global risks.
A boomer, a Gen Xer, and a Millennial discuss the causes and conflicts of today's generational gaps.
"Can someone quickly remind me why we were removing—rather than demoting/labeling—claims that Covid is man made," asked Meta's president for global affairs.
The E.U.’s Digital Services Act will encourage censorship around the world and even in the U.S.
Plus: GOP candidate defends “limited role of government” in parental decisions for transgender kids, some common sense about Diet Coke and cancer, and more…
"Disinformation" researchers alarmed by the injunction against government meddling with social media content admire legal regimes that allow broad speech restrictions.
The response to the decision illustrates the alarming erosion of bipartisan support for the First Amendment.
Plus: A listener questions last week’s discussion of the Supreme Court's decision involving same-sex wedding websites and free expression.
Prominent reporters and powerful officials know each other, share attitudes, and trust each other.
Government bullying won’t fix censorship caused by government bullying.
The glitter-filled movie got involved in authoritarian geopolitics by allegedly displaying Chinese propaganda.
Unfortunately, there is reason to doubt that the judge's decision will meaningfully constrain the feds.
Lai's media company covered the Communist government's abuses when other Hong Kong media wouldn't.
If you can't force a web designer to serve a gay wedding, can you force a web platform to serve a politician?
Thin-skinned authoritarians of the world, unite!
After officials in Orem, Utah, banned “heritage month” displays in the public library, it threatened to discipline librarians who criticized the censorship.
Current culture wars are just one more manifestation of the reality that public education routinely devolves into indoctrination and imposition of majoritarian ideology on dissenters. But school choice can help mitigate that problem.
Plus: A listener question considers the pros and cons of the libertarian focus on political processes rather than political results.
"We find that while removing this content does curb some misinformation, it could also have the unintended effect of curtailing political speech."
A new report calls for policy makers to take action when none is required.
The narrow rulings concluded the platforms aren’t responsible for bad people using their communication services.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10
Notifications