The Fourth Amendment and the "Instinctive" Drug Detection Dog
This one is a search.
This one is a search.
Interesting tidbits in an interview with Adam Liptak
The 2d and 3d Circuits mistook a widely-criticized, private publication for a Founding-era “law.”
If the Trump administration wants to use military power, it should seek authorization from Congress, says Sen. Rand Paul.
"By [activists'] own measurements, these bans aren't successful," says lobbyist Alyssa Miller-Hurley. "What they are successful at is fundraising."
Weakening or removing Section 230 would not fix the problems of social media, and in fact it could make things worse.
Katherine Mangu-Ward and Alex Nowrasteh squared off against Rich Lowry and Steven Camarota to debate immigration.
As Illinois resists the federal immigration blitz, the Trump administration ups the ante on authoritarian rhetoric.
With fewer immigrant workers available on American farms, there is a risk of "supply shock-induced food shortages," the Labor Department says.
A new FinCEN rule forced small money services businesses to collect personal data on nearly every customer transaction. Lawsuits claim this violates the Fourth Amendment.
Novelist Lionel Shriver explains why Americans overinterpret tragedies, compares today’s partisan divisions to the conflicts she witnessed in Northern Ireland, and argues that political manias are driving the country toward destructive extremes.
There are plenty of private alternatives to the employment report put out by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Plus: Air traffic controllers get mysteriously sick, California gubernatorial contenders can't answer basic questions, and more...
Next week, if the Supreme Court decides to reach the merits in the U.S. v. Ellingburg case, it should recognize that restitution to crime victims serves compensatory rather than penal purposes.
"By the end of President Reagan’s administration, the originalist revolution was underway."
The former Biden administration is accused of punishing critics without due process.
Sometimes the state's rules require stores to cover almost the entire label of products—in places that don't even admit minors.
The policy would slow innovation, reduce competitiveness, and leave American workers unprepared for the future.
The federal government can't even pass a budget. What's it doing buying a mine?
Plus, "I don't know how you can vehemently deny that when the evidence is staring us all in the face. That denial is still very troubling to me."
"The fact that disclosure means Plaintiffs 'could be deemed litigious' or that future employers 'may treat Plaintiffs' association with this litigation as a red flag' is not sufficient to allege a substantial privacy interest."
Shadowy deals and unilateral powers created Florida's notorious immigration detention camp.
The Court granted cert to review whether criminal restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act is "penal" in character. But the defendant was ordered to pay restitution under a different statute.
Industry insiders dominate the boards that control who can work, using government power to shut out competitors, protect profits, and block reform.
Plus: World Cup ticket prices, Michael Jordan against NASCAR, and The Smashing Machine
Lawyers at America's largest civil liberties group say the agency’s lack of transparency violates federal disclosure requirements.
In a new Supreme Court term packed with big cases, these disputes stand out.
Rather than targeting cartels, DEA agents are patrolling tourist areas, setting up checkpoints, and even cleaning up litter.
Plus: the legality of Trump’s National Guard deployments, Democrat A.G. nominee’s leaked texts about shooting GOP rival, and what Argentina’s crisis means for libertarians.
Jane and I speak with Eric Heinze (Queen Mary University of London) about how the digital age has transformed the meaning and limits of free expression, from Britain’s recent Lucy Connolly case—involving online incitement and hate speech—to the philosophical and legal contrasts between the American Brandenburg standard and the U.K.’s more interventionist approach.
U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut concluded that the president's description of "War ravaged Portland" was "simply untethered to the facts."