Trump Pledges To Revoke E.V. Mandate in Direct Repudiation of Biden's Platform
Trump may not be able to revoke the rules outright, but polls show that most Americans don't support a mandate.
Trump may not be able to revoke the rules outright, but polls show that most Americans don't support a mandate.
The justices are not persuaded to intervene in state-law climate litigation.
Most researchers report the global temperature last year was more than 1.5 degrees Celsius above the pre-industrial average.
The U.S. already has a base in one of the territories Trump covets. Here’s how the Americans stationed there are told to deal with the people who are actually from there.
The president’s ban on offshore oil and gas drilling perfectly encapsulates his top-down legacy on energy.
Is the Climate Superfund Act unconstitutional?
Isodope founder Isabelle Boemeke discusses the ongoing potential renaissance of nuclear energy.
Increasing energy costs in New York will not significantly address climate change.
Despite the wasteful spending, E.V.s remain unpopular with large portions of the country.
The Juliana plaintiffs are again seeking Supreme Court review of their case.
A state Supreme Court gives environmental activists an important symbolic victory that will not do much of anything to mitigate the threat of climate change.
They are instead promised $300 billion, but the Trump administration will not likely pony any international climate finance.
If confirmed, Chris Wright and Gov. Doug Burgum will have the opportunity to prioritize innovation and deregulation to the benefit of taxpayers and the environment.
The nominee for attorney general passes the Trump loyalty test, but he lacks relevant experience and has repeatedly demonstrated poor judgment.
Climate change is a serious environmental concern, but it is not clear how the EPA helps.
Unsurprisingly, no justice showed any interest in reviving a lawsuit that should have died long ago.
Expect the incoming Trump administration to withdraw from the Paris Climate Change Agreement on Day 1.
Initiative 2117 would have struck down the state’s cap-and-trade greenhouse gas emissions program, which has been criticized for its high cost and unclear results.
But if they admitted that, they would be out of a job.
As hurricane damage mounts, the government is buying—and sometimes seizing—homes in flood-prone areas, sparking concerns over property rights and accusations of discrimination.
The wordy label makes no mention of the environmental agenda driving the bill’s passage.
The plaintiffs in Juliana v. United States are seeking Supreme Court intervention to revive their case against the federal government.
A panel discussion from the Liberalism for the 21st Century conference
Producing plastics from fossil fuels emits a lot of carbon dioxide, but a new study finds the life cycle emissions are actually lower than glass and aluminum.
The self-described "GIS nerd" has boundless faith in the ability of maps to guide top-down government interventions.
It's good to hear a candidate actually talk about our spending problem. But his campaign promises would exacerbate it.
Organizers of the highway obstruction will spend years in jail for their anything-but-peaceful protest.
The U.S. has successfully navigated past debt challenges, notably in the 1990s. Policymakers can fix this if they find the will to do so.
Green groups dropped their suits after the various challenges to the SEC's climate disclosure rule were consolidated in a fairly conservative circuit.
Breakthrough Institute co-founder Ted Nordhaus on climate science and climate change anxiety.
Why do environmentalist ideologues oppose research on a possible emergency backup system to cool the climate?
The district court recognizes that the plaintiffs lack standing, but grants them leave to amend.
A recent panel discussion on whether state and local suits against fossil fuel producers are preempted by federal law (and my arguments for why the answer is "no, they are not").
A unanimous panel orders dismissal of Juliana v. United States, bringing this zombie litigation to a close.
Weather and climate disaster losses as a percentage of U.S. GDP have not increased between 1990 and 2019, a new study finds.
A district court concludes that the Department of Transportation lacks the authority to force states to try and reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with highway use.
Activists oppose research on how to safely deploy an emergency cooling system for the planet.
Plus: Kamala Harris' abortion clinic visit, Karl Marx's hypocrisy, CDC data struggles, and more...
The new reporting rules will force companies to disclose whether they are prioritizing climate change concerns.
In California, which has a slew of renewable energy regulations, the cost of electricity increased three times faster than in the rest of the U.S.—and the state still doesn't even get reliable energy.
Plus: Putin threatens nukes, D.C. mulls a crackdown on theft, Bloomberg blames right-wingers, and more...
Plus: Moscow subway stations, climate activists souping and glueing, Rachel Dolezal's plight, and more...
The jury found no real damages, but gave a sizeable punitive award that could be challenged on appeal.
The Justice Department is wasting no time seeking to put this zombie litigation out of its misery, and the plaintiffs are not happy about it.
Officials admitted at COP28 that they are not "on track" to achieving climate goals. And they are not likely to be any time soon.
The White House seems to have decided that giving a political win to radical environmentalists is more important than actually reducing emissions.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10