Why You Shouldn't Want Congress To Regulate Facebook & Other Social Media
We need to up our media literacy game, not delegate responsibility to politicians who have no idea what they're doing.
We need to up our media literacy game, not delegate responsibility to politicians who have no idea what they're doing.
Prodding private companies into self-censorship is a dangerous government tradition.
A lawsuit leads to a suggestion that the president engage in a kinder, gentler ignoring.
Twitter doesn't need to be a "planetary-scale hate machine" for everybody.
Yes, kooky rumors can spread quickly online. In this case, the angry reactions to those rumors may be spreading even faster.
Four questions to ask yourself before you freak out about Trump's latest tweet
Any excuse to try to censor the internet
They used to call themselves supporters of limited government. Some still do.
Hours later he walks it back.
The "bloody nose" strategy favored by some in his administration is extraordinarily reckless.
As people worry about the net neutrality vote, public officials threaten our rights to free speech.
Do not ignore the self-interest of elected officials in controlling online political messaging.
If our democracy cannot survive another 43 hours of political videos on YouTube, it is already doomed.
Tribalism today, tribalism tomorrow, tribalism forever!
The president is a gift that keeps giving, distracting, and giving more. Wish it would stop.
"It's illegal," the actor says, explaining why a gay relationship between a 17-year-old and a 24-year-old is indecent.
The day everybody got angry at the equivalent of an upgraded hotel mini-bar
But guess what happens whenever art gets in the way of one of his developments?
A federal judge says personal pages used for public purposes implicate the First Amendment.
A lawsuit makes a plausible case that Trump's blocking of critics violates the First Amendment.
Blocked Trump critics argue that his personal account is a "designated public forum" from which they cannot legally be excluded because of their views.
Good job, internet liberals, you got huge clothing conglomerate to stop selling one of its few works benefiting indie creators!
Unmasking anonymous Twitter users who discuss politics is like demanding "dark money" donors disclose their identities for supporting political speech.
This week in 'Privacy for me but not for thee.'
Facebook may be forced to evaluate whether content complies with laws; huge costs if they get it wrong.
Man faces possible prison time for triggering a journalist's seizure.
The idea that Twitter should be run by the federal government is silly. But perhaps the platform isn't best operated as a for-profit public corporation.
'Shut up,' the president explained.
Trump rose to power on tweets; maybe tweets will take him down too.
What could President Trump really do to punish American companies for moving abroad? Well, Congress might try to replace global corporate taxation with a 20% VAT-style levy on everything sold inside the U.S.
Twitter users responded to the Canadian PM's idiotic paean to Castro early and often, showcasing free speech as one of its enemies died.
Hold law enforcement responsible for snooping, not the tech platforms.
Chilled speech isn't like chilled vodka; it sends people out the door quicker than you might think. [UPDATE: Reynolds has been un-suspended.]
There's anti-political correctness, and then there's harassment.
The tech companies agree to review hate-speech notifications within 24 hours and report on their efforts to the E.U.'s "High Level Group on Combating Racism, Xenophobia and all forms of intolerance by the end of 2016."
The fine line between ugly words and true threats
After his campaign manager was charged for grabbing Fields, Trump taunted the reporter on Twitter, asking "Can I press charges?" against her.
Right-wingers and social justice warriors should just mute each other.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10