Kevin McCarthy Wants Twitter to Kick Out a Congressional Candidate
...after months of complaining that social media companies censor too much.
...after months of complaining that social media companies censor too much.
Dismissed advisor attacks billionaire libertarians for pushing free trade and immigration. President calls them "total joke."
If social media feels like a cesspool, don't go swimming.
Trump used Twitter to blast Twitter for allegedly censoring several prominent conservative leaders.
Devin Nunes gets the Richard Spencer treatment.
Guardians of the Galaxy actors say there's more to the man than his old tweets.
Woods' agent reportedly told him he was "feeling patriotic" on Independence Day.
Twitter's Jack Dorsey apologized for eating at Chick-fil-A. What does that have to do with Donald Trump? Plenty.
The First Amendment constrains speech regulation by the government, not by private parties.
The show navigated a fascinating complicated world of ideological diversity. Its star was not so adept.
The ruling against Donald Trump's blocking of Twitter critics provides guidelines for staying on the right side of the First Amendment.
Federal judge rules that the First Amendment prohibits the president from blocking followers based on their political views.
Social media can actually be pretty good at hosting heated conversations about racism and sexism.
The musician and provocateur is spinning the heads of his fans, Trump's fans, and everyone who angrily overinterprets what affection for Trump has to mean.
We need to up our media literacy game, not delegate responsibility to politicians who have no idea what they're doing.
Prodding private companies into self-censorship is a dangerous government tradition.
A lawsuit leads to a suggestion that the president engage in a kinder, gentler ignoring.
Twitter doesn't need to be a "planetary-scale hate machine" for everybody.
Yes, kooky rumors can spread quickly online. In this case, the angry reactions to those rumors may be spreading even faster.
Four questions to ask yourself before you freak out about Trump's latest tweet
Any excuse to try to censor the internet
They used to call themselves supporters of limited government. Some still do.
Hours later he walks it back.
The "bloody nose" strategy favored by some in his administration is extraordinarily reckless.
As people worry about the net neutrality vote, public officials threaten our rights to free speech.
Do not ignore the self-interest of elected officials in controlling online political messaging.
If our democracy cannot survive another 43 hours of political videos on YouTube, it is already doomed.
Tribalism today, tribalism tomorrow, tribalism forever!
The president is a gift that keeps giving, distracting, and giving more. Wish it would stop.
"It's illegal," the actor says, explaining why a gay relationship between a 17-year-old and a 24-year-old is indecent.
The day everybody got angry at the equivalent of an upgraded hotel mini-bar
But guess what happens whenever art gets in the way of one of his developments?
A federal judge says personal pages used for public purposes implicate the First Amendment.
A lawsuit makes a plausible case that Trump's blocking of critics violates the First Amendment.
Blocked Trump critics argue that his personal account is a "designated public forum" from which they cannot legally be excluded because of their views.
Good job, internet liberals, you got huge clothing conglomerate to stop selling one of its few works benefiting indie creators!
Unmasking anonymous Twitter users who discuss politics is like demanding "dark money" donors disclose their identities for supporting political speech.
This week in 'Privacy for me but not for thee.'
Facebook may be forced to evaluate whether content complies with laws; huge costs if they get it wrong.
Man faces possible prison time for triggering a journalist's seizure.
The idea that Twitter should be run by the federal government is silly. But perhaps the platform isn't best operated as a for-profit public corporation.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks