The Supreme Court Should Not Let Bureaucrats Invent Crimes by Rewriting the Law
The Trump administration’s unilateral ban on bump stocks turned owners of those rifle accessories into felons.
The Trump administration’s unilateral ban on bump stocks turned owners of those rifle accessories into felons.
The provisions seem sensible, though there are legitimate concerns about enforcement.
That prosecutors in the Hoosier State successfully denied people this due process is a reflection of how abusive civil forfeiture can be.
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar falsely claims a federal gun ban "requires individualized findings of dangerousness."
In an upcoming Supreme Court case, the Cato Institute argues that the "threadbare procedures" required by federal law provide inadequate protection for constitutional rights.
The U.S. Supreme Court keeps putting off deciding whether to take up a challenge to New York's rent control scheme.
A wave of ballot measures reminds us most Americans are moderate on abortion.
The Supreme Court considers whether and when banishing irksome constituents violates the First Amendment.
Without a prompt post-seizure hearing, people can lose their property for months or years even when they ultimately get it back.
with implications for the pending Supreme Court case of United States v. Rahimi
The appeals court is reviewing an injunction by a judge who concluded that the law is inconsistent with the Supreme Court's Second Amendment precedents.
School officials in three states are effectively immune from lawsuits over excessive corporal punishment. A Louisiana mother is asking the Supreme Court to step in.
Democrats and Republicans are united in thinking their political agendas trump the First Amendment.
Aside from narrowly defined exceptions, false speech is protected by the First Amendment.
The justices agreed to consider whether the Biden administration's efforts to suppress online "misinformation" were unconstitutional.
Sylvia Gonzalez, an anti-establishment politician, spent a day in jail for allegedly concealing a petition that she organized.
The Court is taking more cases from the Fifth Circuit, and its decisions do not appear to be faring well.
A lawsuit against a Black Lives Matter activist could have a chilling impact on constitutionally protected activity.
The Court saw no reason to consider the Eighth Circuit's conclusion that the states lacked standing.
Plus: House speaker battles, a Jesus-themed Trump courtroom sketch, Eric Adams' travel plans, and more...
The decision is another rebuke to states that have imposed broad, location-specific limits on the right to bear arms.
The Solicitor General rejects an academic argument offered in defense of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
If Facebook et al. are pushing a "radical leftist narrative," why don’t they have a constitutional right to do that?
Not all of the justices are happy about the Court's stingy approach to certiorari.
The case will consider whether the government is exempt from takings liability for imposing exactions as a condition of development rights in situations where the exaction is imposed by legislation. Unlike many Supreme Court cases, this one can be resolved very easily by applying a basic principle of constitutional law.
The badly flawed lower court ruling defies the Supreme Court's landmark 2019 decision forbidding such Catch-22 traps, and threatens the property rights of large numbers of people.
Before correcting the record, the former president's spokesman inadvertently implicated him in a federal crime.
"There is no American tradition of limiting ammunition capacity," U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez says, calling the state's cap "arbitrary," "capricious," and "extreme."
The former president is right to worry that supporting restrictions on abortion could hurt him in the general election.
The governor's attempt to rule by decree provoked widespread condemnation instead of the applause she was expecting.
Some estimates suggest the number of abortions has even increased.
New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham thinks violent crime gives her a license to rule by decree.
Local police officials are leery of enforcing Michelle Lujan Grisham's ban on public carry, which gun rights groups have challenged in federal court.
Preferential college admissions violated the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
The Colorado governor finds common ground with many libertarians. But does he really stand for more freedom?
Politicians are throwing laws at the wall and seeing what sticks.
"The opportunity to think for ourselves and to express those thoughts freely is among our most cherished liberties," Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in the majority opinion.
A federal judge compared Waylon Bailey’s Facebook jest to "falsely shouting fire in a theatre."
The appeals court ruled that a Facebook post alluding to World War Z was clearly protected by the First Amendment.
An interesting empirical study looks at whether better briefs lead to better outcomes.
While there is some genuine politicization, it is not as great as often claimed. Proposals to undermine judicial review could easily end up empowering the very sort of authoritarian president progressives fear.
Special Counsel David Weiss will face a Second Amendment challenge if he prosecutes the president's son for illegally buying a firearm.
Thankfully, you don't need fancy dining halls or a college degree to have a good life or get a good job.
Violators are rarely caught, while the unlucky few who face prosecution can go to prison for years.
The decision casts further doubt on the constitutionality of a federal law that makes it a felony for illegal drug users to own firearms.
The Kids Online Safety Act imposes an amorphous "duty of care" that would compromise anonymous speech and restrict access to constitutionally protected content.
Promoting impunity for violating rights as a policy tool? What could go wrong?
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10