Why Is Trump Worried About What Mark Meadows Might Say in the Election Interference Cases?
The former White House chief of staff is one of several former Trump advisers who are cooperating with prosecutors.
The former White House chief of staff is one of several former Trump advisers who are cooperating with prosecutors.
Douglass Mackey's case raised questions about free speech, overcriminalization, and a politicized criminal legal system.
The election conspiracy theorist struck a deal that allows her to avoid prison by testifying for the prosecution.
A federal judge barred the former president from "publicly targeting" witnesses, prosecutors, or court personnel.
Prosecutors asked for longer prison sentences at trial and now seem to be trying again.
President Biden commemorated the 25th anniversary of his tragic death by celebrating legislation passed in Shepard's name. But it was based on a major falsehood.
We need less intrusive law enforcement, not the treatment of crime as a lark.
The collapse of his plea deal set up a clash with his father, who doggedly defends the firearm regulations his son violated.
The two alleged racketeers complain that irrelevant evidence concerning distinct, uncoordinated conduct aimed at keeping Donald Trump in office will impair their defense.
Among the indicted are a Southern Poverty Law Center attorney acting as a legal observer and three people who run a bail fund.
Special Counsel Jack Smith reportedly is keenly interested in whether the former New York mayor gave Trump legal advice while intoxicated.
Special Counsel David Weiss will face a Second Amendment challenge if he prosecutes the president's son for illegally buying a firearm.
Trump and his acolytes' conduct was indefensible, but the state's RICO law is overly broad and makes it too easy for prosecutors to bring charges.
Violators are rarely caught, while the unlucky few who face prosecution can go to prison for years.
End the government’s plea-bargaining racket with open and adversarial jury trials.
When it comes to conflicts with people engaged in unpopular or disfavored speech, too many journalists side with the feds.
Plus: Why don't journalists support free speech anymore?
His state of mind when he tried to overturn the outcome of the 2020 election remains a mystery, perhaps even to him.
The nature of their conduct is a better indicator of the punishment they deserve.
Plus: A listener question concerning drug decriminalization and social well-being
A federal judge objected to two aspects of the agreement that seemed designed to shield Biden from the possibility that his father will lose reelection next year.
Brooke Jenkins took office one year ago this week promising more prosecution for drug and property crime offenders. Crime and overdoses still went up.
Donald Trump commuted Philip Esformes' sentence, but the Justice Department is bent on sending him back to prison.
At a recent congressional hearing, Republicans and Democrats sparred over clemency. But they share more common ground than they'd like to admit.
The government appears to agree that Charles Foehner shot a man in self-defense. He may spend decades behind bars anyway.
Joseph Zamora spent nearly two years in prison after being convicted of assaulting police officers. The Washington Supreme Court overturned his conviction, but local prosecutors want to charge him again to show him the "improperness of his behavior."
Author Leigh Goodmark's end goals of abolishing prisons and defunding police are hard to swallow.
The serial fabulist is accused of wire fraud and lying to Congress.
Prosecutors dropped the case after interviewing 35 witnesses who contradicted the accuser.
A jury convicted members of the Proud Boys without evidence of an explicit plot, let alone one that most of the rioters were trying to execute.
Meg Garvin, John Yoo, and I argue to the California Supreme Court that L.A. District Attorney George Gascon is not free to ignore the commands of California's Three Strikes Law.
The case against the former president is both morally dubious and legally shaky.
Plus: The editors respond to a listener question concerning corporate personhood.
Headlines about the 34 alleged felonies seem to have obscured newly revealed information about the weakness of the charges.
Philip Esformes' case is a story about what happens when the government violates some of its most basic promises.
The continuing ambiguity reflects the legal challenges that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg faces in transforming one hush payment into 34 felonies.
Lakeith Smith's case epitomizes the issues with the "felony murder" doctrine.
Alvin Bragg's case against Donald Trump has put the once-obscure position of district attorney into the national spotlight.
Also: The sensitivity readers come for sci-fi anarchist Ursula Le Guin, how foreign trade can make American supply chains more resilient, and more...
The New York charges look weak, and Americans think they’re politically motivated.
Plus: the terrible case for pausing A.I. innovation
Plus: A listener asks the editors if the nation is indeed unraveling or if she is just one of "The Olds" now.
The case hinges on the claim that the former president tried to cover up a campaign finance violation with which he was never charged.
The Institute for Justice says Robert Reeves' First Amendment rights were violated when prosecutors filed and refiled baseless felony charges against him after he sued to get his car back.
One guy with gambling debts is a news story, but a formal policy of legalized theft is a national scandal.
Bradley Bass' case in Colorado says a lot about just how powerful prosecutors are.