House Proposal Would Expand Federal Warrantless Spying Authority
One bill set to be considered would grow the scope of federal digital surveillance and would authorize the federal government to use those powers against more individuals.
One bill set to be considered would grow the scope of federal digital surveillance and would authorize the federal government to use those powers against more individuals.
In November, the Supreme Court declined to consider an ACLU petition arguing that the public has a First Amendment right to see the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court's classified decisions.
Two decades after 9/11, the government's appetite for spying has only grown.
No matter what the public wants, crises typically leave the state more powerful.
COVID-19 and 9/11 both created opportunities to restrict our liberties in the name of keeping us safe.
History is repeating itself in ways that we, and our kids, will live to regret.
We were warned about the dangerous power of the USA PATRIOT Act. Edward Snowden proved that critics were justified.
Violent acts are already illegal, and new tools will inevitably be used against those who annoy the powerful.
Plus: Biden won't pursue Trump's TikTok and WeChat bans, Mitt Romney's child allowance plan, and more...
Law enforcement has more than enough tools already, argues former Senator Russ Feingold in the Wall Street Journal
Government grows in response to a crisis.
Frightening events create openings for attacks on civil liberties.
The Wyden-Daines Amendment would've prohibited warrantless monitoring of web activity, but it lost by one vote in the Senate. Will Nancy Pelosi bring it back in the House?
An effort by Sen. Rand Paul to forbid warrantless investigation of citizens was soundly defeated.
A congressional battle erupts over how much to reform the soon-to-expire USA Freedom Act—if they reform it at all.
Biden's reputation as a bipartisan dealmaker might be appealing in these polarized times, but his record as a policy maker is atrocious.
A part of the law intended to hold suspected terrorists for deportation is being twisted to justify indefinite detention.
They simply disagree over who should be in charge of misusing and abusing those excessive powers.
Plus: Sondland worked "on Ukraine matters at the express direction of" Trump, why hospital prices are so screwy, D.C. gets pushback for ditching sex work bill, and more...
Rep. Justin Amash and some progressive lawmakers are trying to block it, but most Democrats seem happy to hand more spying powers to a president they are investigating for abusing his power.
The most absurd attack against the Michigan congressman involves ignoring his entire history in office.
Plus: the biggest trouble with Devin Nunes' Twitter lawsuit, the Senate fails to override Trump's Yemen veto, bad news for the gig economy, and more...
Section 215 has been used to secretly access our private data, but hasn't accomplished much.
For years, security state advocates fought to maintain the authority to snoop on your phone records. Are they really giving up?
We were told this sort of spying would only be used to stop terrorists. And yet...
Paul cited Barr's past support for warrantless surveillance. He's right to be worried.
Plus: why Gary Johnson will be good for the Senate, "toxic culture" at the TSA, the dismissal of an anti-FOSTA lawsuit, and a new economic freedom index.
The PATRIOT Act fell out of fashion-but swap "human trafficker" for "terrorist" and let the civil liberties infringements roll!
A surprise tweet to announce a thoroughly conventional new FBI director
"In Russia, the legislation is compared to the USA Patriot Act."
Though Section 215 of the Patriot Act has expired, the NSA's other authorities to spy have not.
Gag order lifted in decades-old case fought by small Internet provider.
Thanks to Edward Snowden, a once-secret and always useless government surveillance programs draws to an end.
Debate performance illustrates that civil liberties and executive-power abuse matter mostly when Republicans run the White House
Federal court invalidates gag order extending more than a decade.
Doesn't rule on constitutionality of Patriot Act surveillance
No appeals, no definition of 'helped,' no due process
A few more months of privacy violations permitted.
Civil liberties group has publicly called for even stronger reforms.
Are there libertarian-leaning Republicans who think Rand Paul is too soft on ISIS?
Power thrives in complexity, just as roaches flourish in the dark.
The NSA and kindred agencies have many more arrows in their quiver than Section 215.
The Obama administration praises death of program while requesting it to be renewed.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10