EEOC Attempts to Administratively Implement Protections Against Anti-Gay Discrimination
Wants to treat a law passed in 1964 as though it also covers sexual orientation
Wants to treat a law passed in 1964 as though it also covers sexual orientation
Mission accomplished
The rapidly evolving fight over gay marriage, anti-discrimination laws, and free speech
Yes, actually, it is about a wedding cake.
Like Scalia, Thomas sides with the ersatz "liberty" of the People (a collectivist notion) against the real liberty of the several persons.
Devastating emotional wreckage from being told no by somebody.
If you think self government means each person is free to govern himself or herself and that the protection of rights and equality under the law serve that end-Scalia says you're wrong.
With little government-sponsored discrimination permitted in the United States any longer, what's left that both groups agree upon?
Activists say government crack down was meant to gain support for the government.
Is ISIS infiltrating The Gays? A CNN exclusive!
Raises questions, but doesn't provide answers, even though he has some.
Thousands celebrate around NYC dive bar where the American gay rights movement was born 46 years ago this weekend.
Gay bars were crucial in the fight for equal rights, which is why they kept getting shut down by the government.
The state should not be involved in marriage. But libertarians who think that this is all that need be said are wrong.
Thousands celebrate around NYC dive bar where the American gay rights movement was born 46 years ago this weekend.
A look back at Baker v. Nelson, with footage from the plaintiffs' marriage ceremony
Personal autonomy and freedom of association not bad ideas to bring up.
Presidential candidates and sitting Congressmen are featured in a film which commands Christian soldiers to fight.
Apparently pointing out transgender immigration detainees are subject to abuse under this administration is bad form.
The initiative had no chance, but did the ruling jump the gun?
For decades, the feds would actively try to destroy the lives of homosexuals.
Wedding cakes were once the least of their problems.
Courts would be required to make sure somebody will pick up the slack.
The milestone you missed
The public will decide, and polls indicate they'll say yes.
Why is this a federal matter?
Gay rights, black neighborhoods, and how reformers paved the way for Eric Garner
Likely presidential candidate had previously seen GOP reducing focus on issue.
Kennedy maintains reputation as the swing vote, but seems to be leaning toward yes.
It's a fairly pure example of compelled speech.
Do not even speak to the outgroup!
It's not just the press stirring the pot as senator files legislation.
Student government resolution opposes allowing the restaurant on campus.
The debate gets really tiresome as we wait for the Supreme Court to rule.
When you debate with words instead of government force, acceptance of gay marriage will win
A comparison between a Senate vote and Indiana's controversy is more baffling than enlightening.
His efforts to get his position across don't seem to be working, but whose fault is that?
Neither the president nor Congress should be playing any role in validating psychological treatments.
The threat of a corporate boycott has sacrificed religious liberties without protecting gays
The latest incredibly important news on cakes and flowers.
Memories Pizza, while not as gay-affirming as many of us would like, didn't announce pending discrimination.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks