Encryption Protects Ukrainians, Dissident Russians, and You
No class of governments can be trusted with access to people’s private communications.
No class of governments can be trusted with access to people’s private communications.
It probably won't save any children, but it might mean the end of encrypted messaging.
Plus: What the U.S. should do about Ukraine, America’s geriatric music market, and more…
Why give legacy media a stranglehold over information that Twitter at its best is great for sharing?
With “keyword warrants,” anyone who queries certain terms on search engines will get caught in the surveillance dragnet.
An academic field rife with hostility to private gun ownership now gets to know the address of every California owner of a weapon, a weapon part, or ammo.
An encryption back door will lead to abusive authoritarian surveillance—even if you present it as a way to stop child porn.
Regulating privacy protections would put the public at greater risk than criminals.
Government domination of education has bred distrust and conflict.
Civil liberties advocates call for a moratorium on federal facial recognition.
Law enforcers have plenty of tools; they just want to paw through our data without effort or expense.
“For diversity jurisdiction to exist, no plaintiff may share state citizenship with any defendant," and "[u]nincorporated associations, including LLCs, have the citizenship of each of their members."
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10