Knitting Website Ravelry Bans All Pro-Trump Content
"Support of the Trump administration is undeniably support for white supremacy."
"Support of the Trump administration is undeniably support for white supremacy."
Plus: Immigration officials confirm Trump tweets about new raids, Elizabeth Warren talks sex work decriminalization, and more...
Hawley is selling it as a way to fight tech-company "bias" against Republicans. Don't believe him.
Be afraid as more journalists and politicians start calling for stronger policing of online speech.
Despite scant evidence, everyone wants to believe that social media has a unique ability to control our thoughts and actions.
In his new book, Fall, the author of Snow Crash, Cryptonomicon, and The Diamond Age, looks to the digital afterlife, and beyond.
The "blogfather" once touted the internet as the antidote to Big Government, Big Business, and Big Media. Now he wants the feds to crack down on social media.
In the best of all possible worlds, such actions wouldn't be necessary. In the current climate, boycotting social media might spark a return to a robust marketplace of ideas.
Social media platforms and governments are "voluntarily" teaming up to ban "violent extremist content." What could go wrong?
The supposed plague of misleading and harmful information on the internet is nothing new, nor is governments' desire to muzzle anybody who says inconvenient things.
Co-founder Chris Hughes' call for antitrust action is vainglorious and misguided.
Legal scholar Jeff Kosseff wanted to write a "biography" of Section 230, the law that immunizes websites and ISPs from a lot of legal actions. He fears he has written its obituary.
Subreddits on sexual themes will also be banned from running ads.
Nancy Pelosi wants to gut Section 230
Censorship continues to be about empowering those in charge.
Will a thirst to punish Silicon Valley destroy our liberty?
He's got his reasons, but they all suck. And will accelerate Facebook's decline as a destination in cyberspace.
Facebook and the end of the open Internet era
Under pressure, democracies have a nasty habit of acting like panicked crowds.
Plus: Senators move to end warrantless NSA spying and the "Paycheck Fairness Act" passes the House.
Do you have a license to link to that story? Will your sexy Tinder photo get confused with a celebrity's?
But that might not stop House Democrats from Net Neutrality-related histrionics.
Europeans want the best of America's online services, even as the government keeps soaking them for billions.
With big tech helping government officials to control the sharing of information, we need to support alternatives to undermine their censorious efforts.
Plus: Reason web-culture coverage past...introducing the millennial presidential candidate...another Seattle "sex trafficking" case based on nonsense
There's no room for errors and online platforms face huge fines, likely encouraging overly broad takedowns.
Plus: Facebook says it's pivoting to privacy, and congressional Democrats want to "save the internet."
Jordan Shapiro's The New Childhood boldly embraces technological innovation and the interconnected world it's creating.
Preliminary FCC report claims the number of Americans with high-speed connections grew by 20 percent in 2017.
Here's how to navigate America's newest ritual.
As the lawsuit against FOSTA hits appeals court, three essays about the law that everyone should read.
Big publishers want new sources of revenue. But trying to force license fees for linking will backfire.
Gun buyers, gay lovers, cannabis customers, and Yelp users are just a few of the groups that benefit from this federal law.
Plus: FDA greenlights new 23andMe test, Kamala Harris gets the Onion treatment, and nobody likes Trump's new shutdown salve.
Online black markets shift faster than police can respond
Yes, the paranoid lunatic is a mega-troll, but the beauty of new media means never having to engage stuff you find awful or offensive.
It's "important to be clear about how rare this behavior is on social platforms," researchers say.
On Monday, a federal appeals court considered Grindr's guilt in a case involving app-based impersonators.
Social media platforms have every right to do whatever the hell they want, but they shouldn't really do much speech policing at all.
Less than 60 percent of online traffic is actually generated by humans. But is that really a problem?
Facebook, Google, Apple, and others are now facing the sort of regulatory and antitrust animus once leveled at Bill Gates' company.
New film The Creepy Line argues that tech giants sometimes silence conservatives and try to steer America left.
But if you're reading this, you know that's not true.
Obama Defense Secretary Ash Carter wants to bring back the Cold War's Office of Technology Assessment. Why?
It's been dubbed "NYC's Anti-Airdrop Dick Pic Law," but the bill is much broader than that.
Research shows a fifth of its users seek out sexual images. But the sharing site is now part of a massive media conglomerate.
Killing Section 230 would only lead web platforms to ban even more speech.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks