Are California's New Data Privacy Controls Even Legal?
A new paper raises constitutional questions about expansive state-level regulations that reach beyond their borders.
A new paper raises constitutional questions about expansive state-level regulations that reach beyond their borders.
Speech was more varied and vibrant than ever before—and then the backlash began.
From personalized magazine covers to 3D videos to cutting-edge podcasts, we've always been ahead of the curve, thanks to your help.
Since FOSTA passed in 2018, "sex workers have faced increased violence" and "have been forced onto the streets," the California congressman says.
Democratic presidential hopeful Andrew Yang thinks so.
A Trick of Light is the result of an unorthodox collaboration between the accomplished young adult novelist and the late Spider-Man creator.
Twitter has made a bad decision when it comes to banning political ads from its site. They should trust users to decide what is right or wrong.
Plus: Cryptocurrency crashes, prison abuse protests in Florida, the death of the center-right, and more...
Plus: Court says scraping social media profiles is not hacking, and more...
Defining terms is tricky, particularly when governments with bad track records on privacy want to call the shots.
For once, the Trump administration is on the right side of a debate with Congress over trade.
But they might be mad at mom for writing about them in The New York Times.
The mostly young demonstrators are calling for autonomy and democracy—and won't be silenced like the NBA.
The creator of "Godwin's law" about Hitler analogies has a bold new vision for free expression, online and off.
If people think cancel culture sucks now, just wait until the government gets involved.
Deregulation didn't end the internet as we know it.
In a lengthy opinion, a divided three-judge panel turns away most of the legal challenges to the Federal Communications Commission's "Restoring Internet Freedom" Order
Glenn Beck says social media outlets are biased against conservatives.
The cases hinges on two laws—FOSTA and Section 230—that have been hotly contested in recent years.
The bad news is he's a congressman now. And he's trying to stomp all over Section 230 in order to attack home-sharing apps.
Trick of Light collaborator talks about working with a legend, the failings of online community, and the rise of cancel culture in the literary world.
Four myths about the law that made the modern internet possible.
The Federal Trade Commission's settlement with YouTube will cripple online video functionality.
Donald Trump, Elizabeth Warren, and "hipster antitrust" scholars and activists say big tech companies need to be broken up. Economist Tom Hazlett says they're wrong.
The unsurprising result of conservatives complaining about Big Tech bias: less speech, not more
Sealed memos fought over in federal court last week show authorities have known for years that claims about Backpage were bogus.
Liability safe harbors for Internet intermediaries are not responsible for Internet "hate speech"
While expressing concern for free speech and privacy, lawmakers are seriously threatening both.
Editor in Chief Kyle Mann talks about being taken literally by fact checkers, whether any subject (even a mass shooting) is off limits, and the libertarian sensibility of his humor.
Plus: 8chan called before Congress, data privacy bill hits a snag, and more...
Companies should forced neither to help spread offensive speech nor to suppress it.
Plus: the trouble with "national conservatism," the decline of the mortgage interest deduction, and more...
The Missouri senator thinks wasting time on Instagram is a problem so big that only the federal government can solve it.
From Josh Hawley to Kamala Harris, online free speech is under attack.
Aggressive asset forfeiture collides with First Amendment rights.
The idea that the internet should enjoy minimal government oversight precisely because it was a technology that enabled open and free speech for everyone has been turned on its head.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R–Mo.) has proposed a dreadful bill that would give the government control of internet content. He thinks the only reason anyone could be opposed is because they've been bought off.
"Section 230 has nothing to do with neutrality. Nothing. Zip. There is absolutely no weight to that argument," Wyden says. He oughta know. He wrote the damn thing.
"Support of the Trump administration is undeniably support for white supremacy."
Plus: Immigration officials confirm Trump tweets about new raids, Elizabeth Warren talks sex work decriminalization, and more...
Hawley is selling it as a way to fight tech-company "bias" against Republicans. Don't believe him.
Be afraid as more journalists and politicians start calling for stronger policing of online speech.
Despite scant evidence, everyone wants to believe that social media has a unique ability to control our thoughts and actions.
In his new book, Fall, the author of Snow Crash, Cryptonomicon, and The Diamond Age, looks to the digital afterlife, and beyond.
The "blogfather" once touted the internet as the antidote to Big Government, Big Business, and Big Media. Now he wants the feds to crack down on social media.
In the best of all possible worlds, such actions wouldn't be necessary. In the current climate, boycotting social media might spark a return to a robust marketplace of ideas.
Social media platforms and governments are "voluntarily" teaming up to ban "violent extremist content." What could go wrong?
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10