America's Forgotten Debt
Neither party is serious about reining in spending. This is unsustainable.
Neither party is serious about reining in spending. This is unsustainable.
Kansas City wants everyone except bus riders to pay for bus rides.
This is why we can't have serious conversations about government spending.
Budget negotiations offer lawmakers the opportunity to ditch tax carve-outs and cut spending.
But at least they had enough tax dollars left over to buy a Bob Dylan-made sculpture for the U.S. embassy in Mozambique, and to get zebrafish addicted to nicotine in London.
The Homes for All Act misdiagnoses the roots of the country's housing problems, then adds a boundless faith in the feds' ability to solve them.
Despite the failure, Pentagon officials are spinning the audit as a step in the right direction.
Episode 8 of Free Speech Rules by UCLA Law Professor Eugene Volokh
Dramatic increases in federal spending will not “unlock access” for the poor. It will only help those with the right connections.
The Democratic candidates are making promises they can’t deliver.
In three years in office, Trump has added more to the national debt than President George W. Bush did in his entire two terms.
The entrepreneur argued instead for a federal universal basic income proposal that would provide every American $1,000 a month.
If Trump threatened to withhold aid funds in order to pressure Ukraine into investigating Joe Biden and his son, he undermined Congress' power of the purse. It's an important aspect of the Ukraine scandal that has so far been largely ignored.
Climate strikes, "Medicare for All," national security whistleblowers, and Canadian blackface scandals are all distractions from D.C.'s core function: spending more money than we have.
The progressive agenda assumes that no amount of taking will ever lead to less earning.
What last week's town hall tells us about this week's presidential debate—and about the state of Democratic policy thinking
A new report from the Reason Foundation highlights some of the worsening conditions of America's roadways.
The idea that "deficits don't matter" has been growing among Trump-supporting Republicans. Democrats are preparing to take full advantage.
As debt soars, federal payments to service the debt will crowd out the government's core spending responsibilities.
CNN doesn't think Americans deserve to hear potential presidents asked about the national debt.
Never before have presidential candidates offered so many giveaways.
And it's actually kind of great.
Presidential candidates promise expensive new programs. We added up the cost.
Both the House and the Senate want transit agencies to stop buying rolling stock from Chinese-owned companies.
Members of Congress are well aware of the looming threat of the $22 trillion (and growing) national debt, but seem incapable of doing anything except making it worse.
The House Freedom Caucus could reverse its trend towards irrelevancy by successfully swaying Trump to turn against the new budget deal.
If President Donald Trump signs the deal into law, he will have authorized a 22 percent increase in federal discretionary spending during his first term in office.
Iran seizes British tanker, White House and Congress approach a budget deal, Bernie Sanders cuts campaign workers' hours, and more...
Reps. Earl Blumenauer and Thomas Massie have introduced a bill that would cut federal airport spending while giving airports more freedom to raise their money.
The Kentucky senator wants the Senate to consider offsetting spending cuts before approving limitless, automatic spending for the rest of the century.
The White House is asking Congress to spend $750 billion on the military this coming fiscal year.
In a few countries, legislators have enacted policies that actually constrain spending. The U.S. has a lot to learn.
Lots of bad ideas from both sides of the political aisle.
The national debt will hit 140 percent of GDP before the end of the 2040s, and that's the optimistic scenario.
Parsing Trump's foreign policy, economic theories, and ideological relationship with the 2020 Democratic field
The Vermont senator is clearly trying to outdo his main progressive rival, Sen. Elizabeth Warren.
There's no need for most federal agencies to be stationed in the nation's capital, one of the most expensive cities in the country.
"Show me the majority for cutting spending," he says.
Demanding that members of Congress be in town to vote on spending huge sums of money seems reasonable.
This might seem like nothing more than a snooze-worthy debate over semantics or economic theory or government P.R. strategies. But it matters a lot.
The president continues to move closer to Democratic proposals on infrastructure spending.
O'Rourke wants net-zero emissions by 2050.
The feds aren't the only ones capable of designing cringe-worthy mascots.
The Empire State's new budget grows government spending and red tape.
The 2020 presidential candidate ran on spending cuts, troop withdrawls, and means-testing Social Security while primarying an incumbent Democrat 7 years ago.
The FIRST STEP Act called for $75 million for reentry programs. It's not listed in the White House's summary.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks