Some Progressives Are Now Claiming California's Recall Election Is 'Undemocratic'
But they don't really think that the recall process is illegitimate or unconstitutional. They simply don't like that it's being used against one of their own.
But they don't really think that the recall process is illegitimate or unconstitutional. They simply don't like that it's being used against one of their own.
As it turns out, state and local tax revenues hardly collapsed.
Can Democrats stop acting as if all the governor's critics are Trump-loving insurrectionists?
Voters who support Gov. Gavin Newsom can still select a successor. That’s left out of a campaign commercial airing during the Olympics.
Undecided folks seem to be turning against the governor.
The list of candidates is released, but radio host Larry Elder is suing over his exclusion. (Updated: a judge ruled in Elder's favor.)
Lawmakers cut out some red tape, but only when it serves the party.
What's it like to run a restaurant in California during the pandemic?
Newsom's subservience to the unions is the best reason to recall him.
Plus: California reopens, the DOJ will tighten its rules on seizing lawmakers' records, and more...
Politicians and policymakers know less than they think they do, in part because they have less power over our lives than they assume.
The state is scheduled to ease its lockdowns on June 15. But Newsom still wants the power to control the terms.
Why the Golden State is losing people, business, and a congressional seat
Party leaders don’t want a replacement on the recall ballot.
California's embattled governor wants to spend $8 billion of the state's surprise budget surplus on individual payments to state residents.
Citizens should be able to punish elected officials who have done an extraordinarily bad job rather than be forced to count on elected legislators to do the heavy lifting.
California Democrats and journalists are suddenly concerned about expensive government.
The public school system is a travesty that does not—and cannot—put students first.
It’s going to be a long summer in the Golden State.
The Riverside County supervisor wants to improve access to school choice and make it easier to build more housing.
Secretary of State’s office verifies his opponents have gathered enough valid signatures.
The former Olympian, reality TV star, and conservative Republican will challenge incumbent Gov. Gavin Newsom in an impending recall election.
Even during a pandemic, major changes to laws and policies should be funneled through state assemblies.
The Supreme Court reaffirms that COVID-19 regulations must comply with the First Amendment.
The majority reminds the 9th Circuit that the First Amendment puts limits on COVID-19 policies.
For months, the owners of Tin Horn Flats have refused to comply with restrictions on their business.
The founder of the Slapfish seafood chain battles arbitrary, non-scientific regulations and a punishing economy while reinventing the lobster roll.
The culinary innovator behind Slapfish on what it's been like to run a business with government at all levels arbitrarily flipping the on-off switch.
So many people are leaving the state that it will soon lose a congressional seat.
The governor has said that his scheme of pandemic restrictions on businesses and social activity will sunset on June 15 provided there are enough vaccines for everyone and hospitalization rates remain low.
An environmental law keeps public agencies from reducing wildfire fuel.
The comparison poses a puzzle for people who believe lockdowns were crucial in controlling the pandemic.
It may, however, be a consequence of authoritarian COVID-19 responses that failed to keep citizens safe.
Gov. Gavin Newsom's executive order banning non-electric cars from being sold after 2035 merely shifts the emissions from the tailpipe to the power plant.
The Reason Roundtable takes on the FDA, Andrew Cuomo, and more.
The governors of New York and California have botched major aspects of the pandemic response.
Big businesses gave millions to Newsom’s initiatives and were rewarded handsomely.
The governor's order had banned outdoor dining and forbade Californians from socializing with members outside their household.
A comparison of Texas and California suggests that legal edicts matter less than The New York Times thinks.
A politician socially distances from his own executive orders.
Small business owners and sheriffs are leading the revolt against Governor Gavin Newsom's stay-at-home orders, which they say are unscientific and ineffective.
A year into the pandemic, politicians still have not digested the dangers of careless public health measures.
The evidence is limited and mixed, but data from New York, Minnesota, and California suggest that restaurants there account for a small share of infections.
The decision says the government failed to present any evidence of virus transmission in restaurants that follow COVID-19 precautions.
The ban is "not a comment on the relative safety of outdoor dining," Mark Ghaly says, but part of the effort to keep people from leaving home.
San Mateo County Health Officer Scott Morrow, who supported last spring's stay-at-home orders, airs his misgivings about reviving that policy.
The governor's latest order dials up restrictions on whole swaths of California's economy in an effort to prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed.