SCOTUS Contender James Ho Combines Respect for Free Speech and Gun Rights With a Troubling Deference to Cops
The 5th Circuit judge is a mixed bag from a libertarian perspective.
The 5th Circuit judge is a mixed bag from a libertarian perspective.
A federal appeals court concludes that the agency's mass collection of phone records was illegal and probably unconstitutional.
The lawsuit argues that the DEA is violating the Fourth Amendment by seizing money from travelers without evidence of criminal activity.
This is the 10th lawsuit in the past few years accusing Chicago police of terrorizing families because of sloppy, outdated search warrants.
The overlap suggests a pattern of shoddy investigation and reckless paramilitary tactics in Louisville.
Trying to distract attention from the deadly corruption in his own department, Art Acevedo demands "action at the national level."
His wrists were too small for the cuffs, though.
Like other innocent owners, Manni Munir finds that fighting a civil forfeiture can cost more than the property is worth.
The charges, which grew out of a lethal 2019 raid based on a fraudulent search warrant affidavit, suggest that cops routinely built their cases on lies.
The State asked the court to impose "(1) a requirement that officers identify themselves and their agency before arresting or detaining any person; (2) a requirement that officers explain to any person being seized that he or she is being arrested or detained; and (3) an enjoinder against arrests that lack probable cause."
The president’s heavy-handed response to protests against police brutality belies his promise of "law and order."
The decision vividly illustrates how the doctrine shields police from accountability for using excessive force.
The report found it was "not uncommon for Narcotics Bureau officers to write false or incomplete narratives that justify their uses of force."
The judicially invented license for police abuse undermines the rule of law and the separation of powers.
Contrary to what Police Chief Art Acevedo seems to think, his department has a systemic problem.
The answer speaks volumes about the extent to which that doctrine protects police officers from liability for outrageous conduct.
She would still be alive if politicians did not insist on using violence to enforce their pharmacological prejudices.
The information in the no-knock warrant application was based purely on guilt by association.
These reforms would protect all Americans while reducing racial disparities in policing.
The felony murder charge against Garrett Rolfe hinges on whether he reasonably believed Brooks posed a threat.
One need not believe every cop is a bigot to recognize that the problem goes beyond a few "bad apples."
That uniform rule is different from the policies favored by Donald Trump and House Democrats.
Pundits often speak of the judiciary in terms of liberal or conservative judges issuing liberal or conservative opinions. The reality is far more complicated.
Plus: Breonna’s Law bans no-knock raids in Kentucky, Amazon's third-party problem, new findings on metabolism, and more...
Responding to a medical alert they knew was erroneous, White Plains officers killed the man they supposedly were trying to help.
The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals' decision is "a precedent-setting error of exceptional public importance," writes dissenting judge.
Abolishing qualified immunity is a crucial step in holding police accountable for violating our rights.
It's not likely to have the chilling effect he expects. Unfortunately, it might not do as much as criminal justice reformers expect either.
If Art Acevedo had any shame, he would be engaging in less grandstanding and more introspection.
The Wyden-Daines Amendment would've prohibited warrantless monitoring of web activity, but it lost by one vote in the Senate. Will Nancy Pelosi bring it back in the House?
The announcement brings the total number of suspect cases initiated by Gerald Goines to 164 over 11 years.
Plus: Virginia decriminalizes marijuana, it's not Trump's call whether we close the country again, and more…
What could happen—and what to do about it—if you get pulled over by the cops
At this point, police can hardly be surprised when they are mistaken for armed criminals.
An effort by Sen. Rand Paul to forbid warrantless investigation of citizens was soundly defeated.
This week the justices are considering 13 petitions involving the pernicious doctrine of qualified immunity.
After seven years of litigation, a Kansas couple finally obtains some compensation for a comically inept drug raid.
Suspected low-level drug crimes don't "justify subjecting the plaintiffs to involuntary catheterization, a highly invasive—and in these cases—degrading medical procedure."
An interesting and detailed analysis by Prof. Alan Rozenshtein at Lawfare.
The justice filed a lone dissent in Kansas v. Glover.
are generally constitutional (whether they forbid travel to a particular place, or require travelers to be temporarily quarantined).
rejecting Fourth Amendment and substantive due process arguments against it.
Fatal police shootings and the Fourth Amendment
Defensive official reactions to corruption encourage the attitude that troubles the attorney general.
The presidential candidate's explanation of his sudden reversal on the issue is utterly implausible.
The company cited a recent federal memo clarifying that agents are expected to obey the Constitution.
The presidential candidate’s gun control platform, like his defense of "stop and frisk," sacrifices civil liberties on the altar of public safety.
After declaring another man arrested by Gerald Goines "actually innocent," the Harris County district attorney says prosecutors are re-examining cases going back to 2008.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks