Brett Kavanaugh's Fourth Amendment Blind Spot
The Supreme Court nominee's skepticism fades when cops and spies look for evidence without a warrant.
The Supreme Court nominee's skepticism fades when cops and spies look for evidence without a warrant.
The Kentucky Republican is worried about Kavanaugh's record on the Fourth Amendment.
Police say there's evidence. His lawyer says it's a fishing expedition.
Thanks to a new state law, agencies now have to report how extensively civil asset forfeiture is used to take people's stuff.
Where does Judge Kavanaugh stand on the Fourth Amendment?
The D.C. Circuit judge is a strong defender of the Second Amendment but seems less inclined to accept Fourth Amendment claims.
Despite the best efforts of a nurse who "loosened their bras" and "checked around the waistband of their panties," no money was found.
The short answer is no. The longer answer is maybe, a little at a time, and that's a problem. Plus, is 2018 turning into 1968, a year of high-profile violence?
Despite Carpenter upending Fourth Amendment doctrine, the Supremes leave the Silk Road founder in prison for life.
Pets shouldn't be treated as contraband.
Comparing the records of two right-of-center justices.
The government's prosecution of the Silk Road founder depended on a Fourth Amendment doctrine made questionable by Carpenter's new respect for the information accessible via modern technology.
In a case involving cellphone location data, Gorsuch says entrusting information to someone does not mean surrendering your Fourth Amendment rights.
SCOTUS rejects warrantless cellphone location tracking in Carpenter v. United States.
The company has no legal obligation to let alien hunters harass its customers unless they have a warrant or probable cause.
No, says the Illinois Appellate Court.
"When a person voluntarily accepts a 'friend' request on Facebook from an undercover police officer, and then exposes incriminating evidence...the Fourth Amendment [does not] protect against this mistaken trust."
SCOTUS rejects warrantless search of vehicle parked in the "curtilage" of private home.
Waiting for Carpenter? This issue may go upstairs next.
An interesting new ruling in the rental car case.
Fourth Amendment advocates score a limited victory in Byrd v. U.S.
Not a good weekend for relationships between officers and citizens
Do you have a reasonable expectation of genetic privacy under the Fourth Amendment?
Stopping drivers without a legal justification is unconstitutional, even in the name of young love.
SCOTUS encourages excessive force by shielding police from liability.
Here's a theory, at least.
"Border searches never require a warrant or probable cause."
The cop's boss says he did nothing wrong; the local D.A. disagrees.
Here are the SCOTUS cases to watch in February.
Shooting revives deliberately misleading talking points about a bad regulation both the NRA and the ACLU opposed.
More Republican skepticism of law enforcement agencies is a welcome development.
Gorsuch advances another property rights theory of the Fourth Amendment that Alito rejects.
The former Director of National Intelligence lied under oath about warrantless NSA spying on American citizens.
The NSA's surveillance of international communications is not limited to "foreign bad guys on foreign land."
Orin asked me to correct the record; I'm correcting it.
Rep. Thomas Massie explains why he will vote "hell no" on renewal of FISA if Congress doesn't reform the 702 program.
Justices hear challenge to Virginia court's expansion of warrantless vehicle searches.
Motel 6 sued for passing names along to ICE.
Why illegally obtained evidence is generally inadmissible in court.
Do we need a constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to drive?
The federal government has no business using information gathered under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act against Americans.
When do unauthorized drivers have Fourth Amendment rights in rental cars?
Silk Road founder's appeal stresses the dangerous Fourth and Sixth Amendment implications of his prosecution and sentencing.
Some people think the Katz "reasonable expectation of privacy" test is hard to reconcile with the text of the Fourth Amendment. Here's why I think they're wrong.
This FISA renewal bill would essentially gut the Fourth Amendment.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks