Designing Institutions that Promote Foot Voting and Minimize Potential Downsides
Fifth and final post in a series based on my new book "Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom"
Fifth and final post in a series based on my new book "Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom"
State reform isn't a complete substitute for abolition of the federal judicial doctrine. But it can achieve a lot. A recent Colorado law provides a model other states would do well to imitate.
A Second Amendment hypocrite with a plan to undermine federalism
Third in a series of posts based on my new book "Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom."
The Department of Justice is finding creative ways to file federal charges against rioters and looters.
The event includes questions and commentary by Northwestern University law Professor John McGinnis
The Introduction summarizes the book's argument and provides an outline of the chapters that follow.
The first in a series of posts based on my book "Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom"
The ruling is yet another setback for the administration, though legal battles over sanctuary jurisdictions will continue.
It is now available for preorder, and will be delivered by June 23.
A podcast debate and discussion about the virtues and vices of Marijuana Federalism.
In this post, I link to their responses and offer a brief rejoinder to Waters.
The video was produced by the Institute for Humane Studies, and goes over some key themes of the book.
A president who can attach his own new conditions to federal grants to states could use that power to undermine state autonomy on many issues - especially now that federal spending has been massively expanded during the coronavirus crisis.
Videos of interviews by political commentator Amy Peikoff and immigration lawyer Nathan Brown.
The symposium, which includes a contribution from me, reviews important new books on secession by Timothy William Waters and Frank Buckley.
Why the Supreme Court can rule in favor of Congress in the Trump financial records cases without thereby giving Congress any unlimited power.
The latest in a long series of setbacks to the adminstration's efforts to pressure sanctuary jurisdictions by attaching conditions to federal grants.
Varying state responses will provide the thing we need most right now: information.
Yes, the Reason Roundtable podcast has gone quarantine-crazy.
While denying Donald Trump's dictatorial impulses, William Barr notes that public health emergencies do not give governments unlimited powers.
It's available for preorder now, and will be delivered on April 23
The article explains why the coronavirus crisis does not justify weakening constitutional limits on federal government power.
We may find that we like making our own decisions.
Your opportunity to learn more about Uncle Sam and Mary Jane.
The president has a history of asserting powers he does not actually have.
Plus: Americans plan to stay home for months, courts block more abortion bans, Amash "looking closely" at presidential run, and more...
The president again insisted that the federal government can open the country by fiat. It cannot.
The president also cannot reopen the country whenever he pleases.
States have so far taken the lead in battling the coronavirus, and there is some merit to this decentralized approach, which fits the original meaning of the Constitution. But it also has flaws, and there is still a good chance the crisis will ultimately lead to an expansion of federal power.
The ruling is in line with numerous other court decisions on the same subject, but conflicts with an anomalous recent ruling by the Second Circuit.
The EPA has talked the talk of cooperative federalism, but it's not yet fully walking the walk.
The legal battle over immigration, federalism, and executive power heats up.
A book released next month will explore the conflict between federal and state marijuana laws, and what to do about it.
Lynchings are already illegal. But the law would give prosecutors more power—including what amounts to an expansion of the federal death penalty.
The decision allows the Justice Department to impose immigration enforcement conditions on federal grants to state governments, and goes against numerous other court decisions striking down the exact same policy.
My 2008 article on this subject is now available on SSRN.
The new lawsuits against the state of New Jersey and King County, Washington have many of the same constitutional flaws as the administration's other efforts to to target sanctuary cities.
How can prosecuting a black woman for slapping Jews in 2020 be authorized by the constitutional amendment that abolished slavery in 1865?
It will be published by Oxford University Press in April.
I took part in panels on these topics at the recent Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention
The new federal ban on animal cruelty converts the Commerce Clause into a general police power.
The constitutional showdown over federalism and immigration approaches SCOTUS.
The latest in a long line of court decisions ruling against Trump's efforts to pressure sanctuary cities into helping deport undocumented immigrants features an opinion by two conservative Republican judicial appointees.
Prof. Brian Frye of the University of Kentucky Law School interviewed me on this subject, as part of his series of "Ipse Dixit" podcasts.
California has largely prevailed in the lower courts, and the administration's petition focuses on the part of the law with the strongest backing from Supreme Court federalism precedent. It's a case the administration deserves to lose.
The Drone Integration and Zoning Act seeks to expand private property rights and give localities more say in airspace regulation.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10