The 'My Boxes' Theory Is All You Need To Explain Trump's Behavior
There's no deep mystery behind why Trump kept boxes of classified documents. He wanted them.
There's no deep mystery behind why Trump kept boxes of classified documents. He wanted them.
The former president's retention of classified documents looks willful and arguably endangered national security.
Plus: A rundown of recent nonsensical proposals for constitutional amendments
Plus: FIRE investigates "woke" Florida professor's dismissal, inequality index finds progress across multiple dimensions, and more...
The recorded comments could be relevant to a charge that the former president willfully mishandled national defense information.
The Durham report is a "black eye" for the FBI, leading Democrats, and the media, says Lake.
Join Reason on YouTube Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern with Eli Lake to discuss what the Durham report tells us about the FBI, the media and U.S. politics.
Despite some headway in protecting privacy, the surveillance state hasn’t gone away.
The FBI's sloppy, secret search warrants should be a concern for all Americans.
Plus: Reexamining the roots of qualified immunity, who's really hurt by business regulations, and more...
The former president says he did not solicit election fraud; he merely tried to correct a "rigged" election. And he says he did not illegally retain government records, because they were his property.
The loss of public key encryption service providers would make us all more vulnerable, both physically and financially.
The feds invoke national security to take away more of your rights and pretend they're keeping you safe.
The COVID-19 lab leak theory was labeled "misinformation." Now it's the most plausible explanation.
The Bottoms Up and the Devil Laughs author and former Reason staffer reports back from post-privacy America.
James King is once again asking the high court to rule that two officers should not receive immunity for choking him unconscious and temporarily disfiguring his face.
A new Netflix documentary shows how the seeds of political polarization that roil our culture today were planted at Waco.
Historian Jeff Guinn's account focuses on the ATF's oft-overlooked fiasco in the 1993 affair rather than the FBI's widely reported involvement.
The botched pursuit of the Russiagate story illustrates how the media shed credibility.
Reviewing and improving the federal government’s data security and digital defenses should be a priority.
If Trump's handling of government secrets was "totally irresponsible," how should we describe Biden's conduct?
Thousands of local, state, and federal law-enforcers have access to sensitive financial data.
Plus: The editors field a listener question on college admissions and affirmative action.
Part of a law that authorizes warrantless snooping is about to expire, opening up a opportunity to better protect our privacy rights.
Prosecuting Trump for keeping government records at Mar-a-Lago now seems doomed for political as well as legal reasons.
In both cases, proving criminal intent would be a tall order.
The first FBI director wasn't all bad (or a cross-dresser). But he and the agency he created regularly flouted constitutional limits on power.
The first FBI director wasn't a cross-dresser, says a new biography, but he was often quick to flout constitutional limits on state power.
People in power lean on private businesses to impose authoritarian policies forbidden to the government.
Congress' end-of-the-year omnibus bill was delayed by arguments over where to build the new facility.
The latest Twitter Files installment shows the FBI paid Twitter millions of dollars to cover the costs of processing the agency's requests. Yikes.
Maybe the FBI has something better to do with its time?
Plus: The editors briefly celebrate a noteworthy shake-up in the Senate.
Content moderators had "weekly confabs" with law enforcement officials, reports Matt Taibbi.
Photos and information you store on iCloud will be safer from hackers, spies, and the government.
The appeals court says Donald Trump's status as a former president does not entitle him to special treatment.
A precedent set in the January 6 prosecutions could be dangerous to the public.
According to the former president's lawyers, his decision to retain the documents made them "personal."
Plus: Pandemic learning loss, German weed legalization, and more...
The FBI changed the way it compiles data, and reporting law-enforcement agencies have yet to catch up.
Plus: Court says DACA is illegal, Colorado baker appeals gender transition cake ruling, and more...
Even if a warrant wasn’t the DOJ’s only option, its choice to go this route doesn’t signal—let alone prove—anything about the future of the probe.
Judge Gary Klausner admits that the FBI probably hid their true motives in rifling through the contents of hundreds of safe deposit boxes, but says that's fine.
The potential crimes that the FBI is investigating do not hinge on the current classification status of the records that the former president kept at Mar-a-Lago.
Even if Trump did declassify those records, the 11th Circuit says, he "has not identified any reason that he is entitled to them."
In any case, that issue does not seem relevant under the statutes that the FBI cited in its search warrant.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks