Some Thoughts on Google v. Oracle, from Prof. Rebecca Tushnet (Harvard)
"Categories, microworks, and market circularity."
"Categories, microworks, and market circularity."
An interesting controversy involving Portland State University.
Likely fair use, at least under the Second Circuit's precedents.
As with all fair use claims, the analysis turns on the particular facts.
So holds Judge Virginia A. Phillips (C.D. Cal.) in Tracy Chapman's lawsuit against Nicki Minaj.
"[T]he Court has little difficulty concluding that Hughes's dual goals in bringing her baseless suit were to inflict financial harm on Benjamin and to raise her own profile in the process."
"The Movants are undoubtedly correct in asserting that 'nationwide sanctions' are rare, but that is only because they are rarely warranted."
"One of the most frequently sanctioned lawyers, if not the most frequently sanctioned lawyer," in the Southern District of New York.
A long-running legal battle ends with a victory for open government.
They trade tips and manuals through a decentralized information-sharing network. Biomedical technicians say it's the fastest and easiest way to get life-saving information.
Four Second Circuit judges gave fair use victories (separately) to rapper Drake and blogger Sargon of Akkad, concluding that defendants' uses of plaintiffs' work to comment on it and criticize it were fair use and thus not copyright infringement.
The Supreme Court now has before it a case in which some very important copyright principles are at stake.
After a three-year freedom of information campaign, everyone can finally see the Egyptian Museum of Berlin’s official scan of the Bust of Nefertiti.
"This judge joins the chorus of those telling this attorney [Richard P. Liebowitz] to clean up his act."
Led Zeppelin may have borrowed from the band "Spirit" in creating the well-known intro to their classic hit, but did they infringe anyone's copyright in doing so?
for what the judge concludes are discovery violations, in a copyright case involving photos of model Emily Ratajkowski.
A fun copyright controversy.
But at least he wasn't labeled a "copyright orc" ....
Rasta Imposta has a history of defending its "unique" banana costume design with copyright litigation.
Do you have a license to link to that story? Will your sexy Tinder photo get confused with a celebrity's?
Federal judge's ruling in a fair-use lawsuit "is a big win for the First Amendment."
The media are supposed to fight censorship. But to protect their financial interests, some European publishers want to mandate it.
Big publishers want new sources of revenue. But trying to force license fees for linking will backfire.
Taste is subjective and food producers have to deal with it
Should the law respect copyrights and patents?
How a risk-averse bureaucracy across the ocean may decide what you say and do online.
Online platforms will be subjected to a costly, easily-abused system that will likely pull down legal content.
Does the rise of data-driven authorship change our intuitions about intellectual property? Does it matter?
What does the rise of data-driven authorship mean for the future of art, culture, and intellectual property rights?
Profs. Kal Raustiala & Chris Sprigman will be guest-blogging about this week, based on their new law review article.
When alt-right activists adopted this amphibian as their own, were they stealing a cartoonist's property or exercising free speech?
The Post Office must pay $3.5 million for using a "fresh-faced," "sexier" Statue of Liberty replica on a stamp.
Lawmakers resist plan that would likely lead to widespread censorship of online media sharing.
A poorly written proposal to expand copyright claims could potentially decimate online sharing of information.
Meet Eric Lundgren, who got 15 months in prison for selling pirated Microsoft software that the tech giant gives away for free.
And that's not copyright infringement, if they only copy short phrases, especially ones that were themselves largely copied from others.
Boing Boing has filed a motion to dismiss.
At the close of this year, for the first time since 1997, copyrighted works will fall into the public domain, free for all to use.
Onerous IP laws threaten a free and open internet in a way deregulation never can.
A legal fight involving the alt-right, Trump voters, one of Washington, D.C.'s most powerful law firms, and the website 4chan is brewing.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10