Trump's Pick for 'Regulatory Czar' Ain't Bad
Neomi Rao wants to keep an eye on the regulators.
Neomi Rao wants to keep an eye on the regulators.
Blocked Trump critics argue that his personal account is a "designated public forum" from which they cannot legally be excluded because of their views.
Which is more important to the president: hurting Muslims or looking tough on terrorism?
The checks and challenges invited by the president's "serial recklessness" should be welcomed.
It's more complicated than you think and one method involves a constitutional amendment invoked when presidents get colonscopies.
Should we interpret the Constitution as a living document?
Since possessing a firearm in public may be perfectly legal, more is required for a police stop.
Once the trust in checks and balances is eroded, it's difficult to regain.
It's time to bring back meaningful Congressional oversight of the executive branch.
A signing statement suggests the president may ignore a congressional rider protecting patients' access to cannabis.
Government censorship always wears the mask of 'public interest,' and this will be no different.
A First Amendment lawsuit explains why Dean is wrong to think Berkeley's cancellation of Coulter's speech was constitutionally unproblematic.
The former DNC chairman's First Amendment analysis is spectacularly wrong.
For civil libertarians, the newest Supreme Court justice is better than the nominee who never got a hearing.
The justices could choose to look the other way because of the plenary power doctrine.
Arizona is the only state that does not require proof of sexual intent to convict someone of molesting children.
The SCOTUS nominee called Brown v. Board of Education "one of the shining moments in constitutional history."
New York merchants are challenging a state law that dictates the way they describe prices.
The Senate minority leader can reject a Supreme Court nominee for any reason he wants, or even none at all.
Trump's main goal is looking tough, not discomfiting Muslims.
Minnesota becomes the 39th state to allow Sunday liquor sales.
Courts assume a "frightening and high risk of recidivism," based on an unsupported claim in Psychology Today.
Can U.S. courts compel non-citizens to pay restitution to other non-citizens for crimes that took place abroad? Apparently so.
The order reportedly exempts visa holders and Iraqis as well as legal permanent residents.
Circuit court judge rules St. Louis County ordinance to be "not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad."
The court says the law "bears no reasonable relationship to protecting the public."
The appeals court says the prohibited guns and magazines are outside the scope of the Second Amendment.
The right to armed self-defense is not a license to muzzle nosy doctors.
What will the president do to address the 9th Circuit's due process concerns?
Stephen Miller falsely claims "legal permanent residents were not subject to the travel restrictions."
The government's failure to cite relevant examples helped ensure its defeat.
The appeals court thinks many people affected by the executive order have plausible due process claims.
A vigorous advocate of presidential prerogatives says Trump's promises regarding NAFTA, tariffs, and a border wall exceed his authority.
The federal judge who halted President Trump's travel ban overreached.
In an appeals court hearing, the government struggles to provide evidence that the executive order addresses "a real risk."
Unlike the president, Neil Gorsuch understands the role of an independent judiciary.
The travel ban is unfair and illogical, but that does not make it illegal.
The SCOTUS nominee plumbs the peculiarities of prohibition in cases involving imitation pot and medical marijuana.
Terrorism is only a real threat if it frightens us into destroying our liberties.
"I tend to err on the side of security, I must tell you."
The SCOTUS nominee is not afraid to challenge the government when it exceeds the law.
Neal Katyal says a ruling cited by the SCOTUS nominee's opponents shows why liberals should support him.
Let's hope he conserves the Constitution.
Young Americans for Liberty (YAL) members are fighting back after being charged with trespassing for handing out constitutions without permission.
The program purports to treat people with statutorily defined mental illnesses but has not cured any.
Under Mikki Canton's blatantly unconstitutional plan, incivility would be punished by community service.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks