More Than a Third of Americans Have No Idea What the First Amendment Says
And 20 percent don't know atheists have the same rights as everyone else.
And 20 percent don't know atheists have the same rights as everyone else.
The police punish people for living in a bad neighborhood.
Kentucky senator talks about his vote on intervention-authorizations, says John McCain "has never met a war he wasn't interested in getting the U.S. involved in," and worries about "these generals whispering in" Trump's "ears every day."
Matt Welch interviews the libertarian-leaning legislators, as well as Emily Yoffe and Eli Lake, on Channel 121
Claims of "frightening and high" recidivism rates, endorsed by the Supreme Court, have no basis in fact.
"The neoconservatives and the neoliberals believe the president has unlimited authority," senator complains during unsuccessful attempt to repeal the post-9/11 authorizations for the use of military force.
Michigan activist Keith Wood argues that his jury tampering conviction violated the First Amendment.
SAG-AFTRA and the State of California claim websites like IMDb have a proactive duty to help actors hide their ages from casting directors.
A federal judge rules that Colorado's online database violates the Eighth Amendment.
Federalism is alive and kicking in the age of Trump.
The notorious former Maricopa County, Arizona, sheriff was held in contempt by a federal judge.
Libertarian legal ideas are gaining ground.
A federal judge says personal pages used for public purposes implicate the First Amendment.
Is gun control a political thicket that unelected judges should not enter?
The court says retroactive application of the requirements violates the constitutional ban on ex post facto laws.
This confiscation, even beyond Second Amendment concerns, amounts to an unconstitutional taking of personal property.
Irrational, half-baked anti-terrorist policies are not necessarily unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court to decide if gerrymandering is unconstitutional
Neomi Rao wants to keep an eye on the regulators.
Blocked Trump critics argue that his personal account is a "designated public forum" from which they cannot legally be excluded because of their views.
Which is more important to the president: hurting Muslims or looking tough on terrorism?
The checks and challenges invited by the president's "serial recklessness" should be welcomed.
It's more complicated than you think and one method involves a constitutional amendment invoked when presidents get colonscopies.
Should we interpret the Constitution as a living document?
Since possessing a firearm in public may be perfectly legal, more is required for a police stop.
Once the trust in checks and balances is eroded, it's difficult to regain.
It's time to bring back meaningful Congressional oversight of the executive branch.
A signing statement suggests the president may ignore a congressional rider protecting patients' access to cannabis.
Government censorship always wears the mask of 'public interest,' and this will be no different.
A First Amendment lawsuit explains why Dean is wrong to think Berkeley's cancellation of Coulter's speech was constitutionally unproblematic.
The former DNC chairman's First Amendment analysis is spectacularly wrong.
For civil libertarians, the newest Supreme Court justice is better than the nominee who never got a hearing.
The justices could choose to look the other way because of the plenary power doctrine.
Arizona is the only state that does not require proof of sexual intent to convict someone of molesting children.
The SCOTUS nominee called Brown v. Board of Education "one of the shining moments in constitutional history."
New York merchants are challenging a state law that dictates the way they describe prices.
The Senate minority leader can reject a Supreme Court nominee for any reason he wants, or even none at all.
Trump's main goal is looking tough, not discomfiting Muslims.
Minnesota becomes the 39th state to allow Sunday liquor sales.
Courts assume a "frightening and high risk of recidivism," based on an unsupported claim in Psychology Today.
Can U.S. courts compel non-citizens to pay restitution to other non-citizens for crimes that took place abroad? Apparently so.
The order reportedly exempts visa holders and Iraqis as well as legal permanent residents.
Circuit court judge rules St. Louis County ordinance to be "not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad."
The court says the law "bears no reasonable relationship to protecting the public."
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks