White House Adviser Revises History in Defense of Trump's Travel Ban
Stephen Miller falsely claims "legal permanent residents were not subject to the travel restrictions."
Stephen Miller falsely claims "legal permanent residents were not subject to the travel restrictions."
The government's failure to cite relevant examples helped ensure its defeat.
The appeals court thinks many people affected by the executive order have plausible due process claims.
A vigorous advocate of presidential prerogatives says Trump's promises regarding NAFTA, tariffs, and a border wall exceed his authority.
The federal judge who halted President Trump's travel ban overreached.
In an appeals court hearing, the government struggles to provide evidence that the executive order addresses "a real risk."
Unlike the president, Neil Gorsuch understands the role of an independent judiciary.
The travel ban is unfair and illogical, but that does not make it illegal.
The SCOTUS nominee plumbs the peculiarities of prohibition in cases involving imitation pot and medical marijuana.
Terrorism is only a real threat if it frightens us into destroying our liberties.
"I tend to err on the side of security, I must tell you."
The SCOTUS nominee is not afraid to challenge the government when it exceeds the law.
Neal Katyal says a ruling cited by the SCOTUS nominee's opponents shows why liberals should support him.
Let's hope he conserves the Constitution.
Young Americans for Liberty (YAL) members are fighting back after being charged with trespassing for handing out constitutions without permission.
The program purports to treat people with statutorily defined mental illnesses but has not cured any.
Under Mikki Canton's blatantly unconstitutional plan, incivility would be punished by community service.
"Congress has spoken on this matter and it is for Congress, not this Court, to revisit."
The 'Heartbeat Bill' was considered too unconstitutional to touch, but "Trump's election changed the dynamic."
Rulings deem Indiana and North Carolina laws unconstitutionally vague and unjustifiably wide.
Bipartisan Senate bill would make "judging Israel by a double standard" a hate crime.
The justice Trump admires twice voted to overturn criminal penalties for flag burning, which Clinton later tried to reinstate.
The president-elect reserves the right to torture terrorism suspects for revenge.
Don't count on resistance from the white establishment
If only they'll need it more
Is hosting a file that instructs a 3D printer how to make a plastic gun such a threat to national security that the First Amendment must take a back seat?
Legal scholar laid the groundwork for the modern revolution in sensible Second Amendment jurisprudence.
While Trump does not know what the Constitution says, his opponent doesn't care.
Both candidates promise appointees who share their policy views.
Why top libertarian and conservative legal scholars oppose the GOP candidate.
Conservatives hoping Trump will be better than Hillary on SCOTUS are fooling themselves.
Attempts by cabbies in Milwaukee and Chicago to crush competition from Uber-like services or more taxi drivers both shot down in federal court by Judge Richard Posner; Reason Foundation amicus brief relied on.
Visa and Mastercard had ceased serving the site under threat of sanction from the Illinois sheriff.
The ruling also rejects an "assault weapon" ban, caliber restrictions for long guns, a heavy handgun tax, and registration requirements.
The plaintiffs argued that the newly mandated stigma is unconstitutional.
Idaho's law is similar to Michigan's, which a federal appeals court recently deemed punitive.
The next president could choose up to five Supreme Court Justices.
Just hours after New York bombing suspect was caught, Trump was already bemoaning how slowly the wheels of justice are turning.
Gun rights groups argue that the District of Columbia's restrictions on self-defense outside the home violate the Second Amendment.
Even though it never passed, the courts have ruled women and men should be treated the same.
Fifteen years later, we really do have "nothing to fear but fear itself"
The 9th Circuit upholds retroactive application of Arizona's registration requirement for sex offenders.
How a 229-year-old document disrupted both major-party conventions
A federal appeals court finds little evidence that the burdens imposed by sex offender registries are justified.
Concluding that retroactive application of the law is unconstitutional, the appeals court also questions its rationality.