Despite bioethical handwringing, they pose no special risks to future generations
If Times editors don't want to learn about their genetics, then they simply shouldn't take the tests.
A new international commission will consider the pros and cons of human genome editing.
There is no compelling ethical reason to limit this exercise of reproductive liberty.
Do you want to be in control group or the experimental group?
Wired's co-founder talks about the "Neobiological Revolution" and what happens when computer science and engineering meet evolution.
It's past time to tell your anti-GMO friends, family and neighbors they are helping to kill poor people.
Alkahest's vampire cure for aging experiment yields equivocal results
Never let the facts get in the way of a good agenda-driven story.
People seeking to flourish should have the freedom to enhance their bodies and minds
Bioethicists in Britain say yes. But there are no such limits in the U.S. yet.
Will most babies be created using in vitro gametogenesis in 40 years?
I don't want to have a "conversation" with regulators; I want them to get the hell out of the way
Swedish researcher denounced by bioconservatives for using CRISPR genome-editing on human embryos
A review of Beyond Human: How Cutting-Edge Science Is Extending Our Lives
Also most babies will be created using skin cells and the bioethics of radical life extension
National Institutes of Health bioethicists agree with me and lift research moratorium
If you happen to be Moscow drop by tonight at the DI Telegraph Building on Tverskaya - can also watch live
Scientists are trying to achieve just this goal, but some ethicists are opposed to the research
Genomes are not "sacred" entities needing some kind of special moral consideration.
Why should not men be eligible for uterine transplants?
Ordering people to reproduce in only government approved ways is tyrannical and unethical.
State mandated eugenics is always evil.
Researchers will use CRISPR gene-editing technique to explore how human embryos develop.