A U.K. bioethicist makes the case for deploying CRISPR gene-editing to modify human embryos in the next two years.
The difference between two identical genes—one edited and the other a natural mutation—is entirely metaphysical.
Despite bioethical handwringing, they pose no special risks to future generations
The presidential hopeful doesn't realize that government biotech crop regulation helped to create the monopoly in the first place.
A new international commission will consider the pros and cons of human genome editing.
Tune in and participate in Reason's livestream interview tonight.
Scientifically Absurd Proposed FDA Regulations on Genetically Improved Livestock Should Be Withdrawn Immediately
"If DNA is a drug, then all life on Earth is high."
Also most babies will be created using skin cells and the bioethics of radical life extension
Ordering people to reproduce in only government approved ways is tyrannical and unethical.
State mandated eugenics is always evil.