GOP Lawmaker Blocks IVF Protection Bill
Plus: Diminishing differences in regional attitudes, IRS begins monitoring small transactions, and more…
Plus: Diminishing differences in regional attitudes, IRS begins monitoring small transactions, and more…
IVF at "significant risk"
It would be deeply immoral to require parents to select for particular traits, but it is also wrong to deny them the chance to make life easier for their children.
Flinging around such terms is not helpful and does not advance the debate.
There is no compelling ethical reason to limit this exercise of reproductive liberty.
Will most babies be created using in vitro gametogenesis in 40 years?
Due to FDA ban parents must resort to treatments abroad in order to have a healthy baby
Why should not men be eligible for uterine transplants?
So argues Eugene Volokh, albeit with a bit more subtlety.
A contract is a contract, but a more generous spirit might relent
Permissionless innovation works best for both scientific and moral progress.
Naturally the usual bioluddites are eager to stop progress.
Recent advances in uterus transplantation will soon make this possible
Just because it's new doesn't mean that it's wrong.
GenePeeks aids parents in their quest for healthier babies by reducing the odds of structural or genetic birth defects.
The bioethics of in vitro fertilization and birth defects