In vitro gametogenesi could allow same-sex couples, post-menopausal women, and couples experiencing infertility to have children.
IVF at "significant risk"
There is no compelling ethical reason to limit this exercise of reproductive liberty.
Will most babies be created using in vitro gametogenesis in 40 years?
Why should not men be eligible for uterine transplants?
So argues Eugene Volokh, albeit with a bit more subtlety.
A contract is a contract, but a more generous spirit might relent
Permissionless innovation works best for both scientific and moral progress.
Naturally the usual bioluddites are eager to stop progress.
Recent advances in uterus transplantation will soon make this possible
Just because it's new doesn't mean that it's wrong.