Abolish the FCC
Let the invisible hand regulate the invisible resource.
The decades-old regulation imposes burdens that no other media outlets are subject to.
A three-judge panel concludes the rule's challenger are likely to succeed on the merits.
A majority of the judges concludes this fee constitutes a tax, the authority for which is improperly delegated.
How cable TV transformed politics—and how politics transformed cable TV
Plus: Why don't journalists support free speech anymore?
How not to distribute federal funds
Starlink is the biggest player in the satellite business, for now.
If Europe really cared about e-waste it would stop mandating inefficient products.
A lawsuit attempts to find out how federal agents are implementing Wickr, a communications service that has an auto-erase function.
It is the equivalent of mandating that all new homes come with at least five bathrooms.
Plus: How Facebook killed blogging, the trouble with so-called common good originalism, and more...
The Biden administration is manufacturing a market failure to justify spending $100 billion on municipal broadband and other government-run internet projects.
That's a high price to pay because some politicians are angry about a little Facebook moderation.
A century before its threats against TikTok, Washington pried a different media company out of foreign hands.
These theories are dumb. Destroying 5G infrastructure is not going to prevent the spread of COVID-19.
Somebody tell the FBI and Congress.
Deregulation didn't end the internet as we know it.
Plus: How anti-tech lawmakers are beholden to "Big Telecom," the triumph of hard seltzer, "abortion reversal" law nixed, and more...
Hawley is selling it as a way to fight tech-company "bias" against Republicans. Don't believe him.
Legal scholar Jeff Kosseff wanted to write a "biography" of Section 230, the law that immunizes websites and ISPs from a lot of legal actions. He fears he has written its obituary.
This is not an antitrust case and the Justice Department shouldn't have been trying to block it.
The company that brought you that wince-inducing "fake news" promo is not a "monopoly," and cracking down on it will not defend the free press.
No, the government shouldn't nationalize our mobile infrastructure.
Set aside the Chicken Little fears about the internet dying.
The DOJ fundamentally misunderstands the market for access and content.
It's all about deregulation to foster innovation.
The Obama-era "Open Internet Order" discourages a free internet.
Goodbye and good riddance to the Obama administration's "Open Internet Order."
By nearly eliminating their equivalent of the Federal Communications Commission, Danes now enjoy some of the best IT and telecom services on earth.
The company argued that it had a free-speech right to text users unauthorized birthday reminders.
Google's ad model also targeted by suit, which tries to hold the communications entities responsible for how its users use them.
If we're not willing to rein in law enforcement, why should a telecom company?
The company insists forcing it to be liable for its hosts' misbehavior violates the Communications Decency Act, and forcing it to collect and deliver information on hosts to city violates Stored Communications Act.
Potential pork projects hardest hit.
The historical importance of the National Science Foundation's decision to surrender control of the internet
Hard cases make bad law and exploiting grief is bad politics.
Secure communications for me, but not for thee.
Private-sector innovations trump government-controlled monopolies.
Pollsters like Nate Silver are understandably freaked out, but it's not the government's job to protect their business model.
New net neutrality rules give the agency veto power over ISP innovations.
The agency's new Internet rules will only make the Web worse.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10