U.K.'s Online Censorship Bill Causes Far More Harm Than It Attempts To Prevent
The innocuously-titled Online Safety Bill threatens citizens' rights to privacy and to speak freely.
The innocuously-titled Online Safety Bill threatens citizens' rights to privacy and to speak freely.
A robust market of monitoring technology already exists. There's no need to boost it further by government fiat.
The creator of The Moth talks about why the past is never dead, especially in his new novel The Kingdoms of Savannah.
The rapper, podcaster, and author talks about "freedom, liberty, and all of that good stuff."
"The fact-checking industry has become a partisan arbiter of political disputes," notes Phil Magness.
Plus: A rebranded "Build Back Better," the two-party system creates "a disconnect between elites and non-elites," and more...
Plus: Arizona prisons censor The Nation, Facebook's feed changes, and more...
For the officer's excessive force, the protester was later awarded a $175,000 settlement over the 2016 incident.
''The kind of values I've always embraced are heard more on Fox than on CNN and MSNBC," says the Pulitzer Prize–winning progressive journalist.
“Without full briefing and argument,” Kagan objects, the Court is quietly resolving major disputes.
A lawsuit alleges that the social media giant "tries to conceal the dangerous and addictive nature of its product, lulling users and parents into a false sense of security."
The bill makes little note of parents' ability to control their own children's social media access.
Dedication to free speech is in short supply around the world, with Britain and Canada previously considering similar bills.
Social media platforms may marginally support free speech. Government censors are trying to stop that.
A recent college grad from the Midwest landed in the Bronx and was confused by bodega culture. This led to a social media mob, a digging up of old videos, and a firing.
Plus: Facebook censors information on abortion pills, TikTok provokes the ire of the FCC, and more...
Anti-discrimination law was pioneered by the political left. But, in recent years, conservatives have increasingly tried to use it for their own purposes.
Looking back at how abortion advertising bans played out last century may give us some idea what the future holds for speech about abortion.
What happens when YouTube and Facebook can be held liable for their users’ speech?
"We enforce our policies equally for everyone," said a spokesperson.
Plus: Who's bringing fentanyl across the border? Will Austin become a sanctuary city for abortion? And more...
The ruling is not a final decision on the merits. But it likely signals that at least five Supreme Court justices believe the law is unconstitutional.
The answer to “Why should these people go to prison?” should not be ill-informed gibberish.
A new ruling says Twitter and Facebook are not “common carriers" and thus cannot be forced to carry politicians' messages.
It seems like an ambiguous episode that was handled appropriately.
Coal, oil, and gas have contributed to global warming, but we can deal with their impact while letting them bring billions more up to middle-class living standards.
Plus: Twitter defends user anonymity, Oklahoma legislature approves abortion ban, and more...
Massie was the only House member to vote against a resolution demanding social media companies do more to track and suppress antisemitic content.
In response to the Buffalo massacre, Gov. Kathy Hochul invoked a hoary analogy to justify censorship.
The law forces social media firms to host and promote speech they oppose, and would set a dangerous precedent if upheld by the courts.
"It's all induced by the internet," she said.
Maybe it's not a good idea for the government to prohibit all viewpoint-based moderation on social media.
Plus: A democratic socialist running for office is caught up in a MeToo witch hunt, inflation woes continue, and more...
Comparing Elon Musk and Barack Obama underscores why entrepreneurs, not politicians, are the more effective agents of social change.
Plus: Elon Musk's plans for Twitter, officials want to tax NFTs, and more...
The libertarianish Colorado Democrat is devolving decision-making to parents and trying to lower the income tax to zero.
The alarm aroused by the Disinformation Governance Board is understandable given the administration’s broader assault on messages it considers dangerous.
This “unprecedented crisis for democracy” is neither unprecedented nor a crisis for democracy.
The co-founder of "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit" talks about the power of decentralization and the rise in subscription models for journalism.
The board's head says she is dedicated to "protecting free speech," but she has also expressed direct opposition to "free speech absolutists."
While Americans debate what should be allowed on social media, the EU wants government to decide.
The online encyclopedia's decentralized, Hayekian approach provides a model for Elon Musk as he assumes control of Twitter.
"I am not okay with you making laws that prevent me from doing what I feel is good for me."
Today's big powerful companies could become tomorrow's also-rans, no government intervention required.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10