William Barr Responds on American Petroleum Institute v. Minnesota
The former Attorney General disagrees with me on whether state and local government climate change lawsuits belong in federal court.
The former Attorney General disagrees with me on whether state and local government climate change lawsuits belong in federal court.
His lawyers say no jury can ever consider charges based on his "official acts" as president, which include his efforts to reverse Joe Biden's election.
Yet another federal circuit court of appeals rejects energy company removal claims.
Another climate change lawsuit filed on behalf of children, this time against the Environmental Protection Agency.
Justice Jackson notes her objection to the Court's standard practice of vacating lower court decisions rendered moot by the prevailing party below.
The Trump administration’s unilateral ban on bump stocks turned owners of those rifle accessories into felons.
The Court is taking more cases from the Fifth Circuit, and its decisions do not appear to be faring well.
Is Common Good Constitutionalism anything more than politics by other means?
We need less intrusive law enforcement, not the treatment of crime as a lark.
An emergency proclamation by Gov. Josh Green offers developers the opportunity to route around almost all regulations on building homes.
Geoffrey Swenson’s book Contending Orders tackles Afghanistan and Timor-Leste.
Plus: A listener inquires about the potential positive effects of ranked-choice voting reforms.
The judges recognize that Congress ended their ability to review the Mountain Valley Pipeline, but they seem none too happy about it.
The nature of their conduct is a better indicator of the punishment they deserve.
The Supreme Court vacated a stay entered by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
It's a short-sighted approach that distracts us from the more important question.
The furious response to a seemingly modest reform reflects a broader dispute about the role of courts in a democracy.
Judge Rao's 2022 Canary lecture has now been published in the Case Western Reserve Law Review.
Contrary to popular perception, the current Supreme Court overturns precedent and declares laws to be unconstitutional less often than its predecessors did.
The appeals court judge argued that the Israeli Supreme Court had usurped the role of legislators.
Lai's media company covered the Communist government's abuses when other Hong Kong media wouldn't.
The President strongly criticized the Supreme Court's recent decisions, but refuses to endorse radical reform.
Chief Justice John Roberts decisively rejected the independent state legislature theory.
We once ranked No. 4 in the world, according to the Heritage Foundation. Now we're 25th.
If the Florida governor wants better behavior, he should model better behavior.
Could the Court treat Justice Powell's Bakke opinion the way it treated Justice Kennedy's Rapanos opinion?
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch highlights a vital lesson from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Plus: A listener asks if the Roundtable has given the arguments of those opposed to low-skilled immigration a fair hearing.
J.D. Vance and Co. are trying to give themselves permission to wield public power unconstitutionally.
Why the businessman launched a long shot campaign for the presidency.
The former president reminds us that claiming unbridled executive power is a bipartisan tendency.
The former president says he did not solicit election fraud; he merely tried to correct a "rigged" election. And he says he did not illegally retain government records, because they were his property.
"If there is freedom, private property, rule of law, then Latin Americans thrive," says the social media star.
Today's opinions are a requel to prior splits among the most recent Republican appointees to the Supreme Court.
Plus: The editors respond to a listener question concerning corporate personhood.
Headlines about the 34 alleged felonies seem to have obscured newly revealed information about the weakness of the charges.
Opponents of the proposed reforms are right that unlimited majority rule is a recipe for tyranny.
Plus: A listener asks the editors if the nation is indeed unraveling or if she is just one of "The Olds" now.
The case hinges on the claim that the former president tried to cover up a campaign finance violation with which he was never charged.
Opponents of the reforms favored by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition should acknowledge the threat posed by unconstrained majority rule.
The president wants to redefine federally licensed gun dealers in service of an ineffective anti-crime strategy.
The president and his predecessor both tried to impose gun control by executive fiat.
Although the law did not change, regulators suddenly decided to criminalize unregistered possession of braced pistols.
These days, he may run for president. His politics have changed.
A proposal to limit state AG (and other) forum-shopping for national injunctions.
The decision defends the separation of powers and the rule of law against an attempt to prohibit firearm accessories by administrative fiat.
Jonathan Mitchell failed in his effort to become a legal academic, so he put his theories into practice instead.
According to the former president's lawyers, his decision to retain the documents made them "personal."
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks