Can a Web Designer Be Forced To Make Gay Wedding Pages? The Supreme Court Will Decide
Will this follow-up to the famous wedding cake case finally decide if this is mandated speech violating the First Amendment?
Will this follow-up to the famous wedding cake case finally decide if this is mandated speech violating the First Amendment?
Well-intentioned regulation often constrains the development and deployment of clean technologies.
Plus: CDC withholds data, court upholds nutritionist licensing, Ottawa police break up Freedom Convoy, and more...
"Think long and hard," Breyer warns would-be court packers, "before embodying those changes in law."
Why the arguments the Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction to hear the latest climate change case likely lack merit.
A federal district court has taken the unusual step of enjoining an Executive Order setting forth an Administration's regulatory priorities.
Ryan Murphy's take on the Clinton impeachment has a bipartisan message about the corrupting nature of power.
We were told it would be "transitory." But inflation continued to rise.
Walensky acknowledged "limitations" of available studies but told a congressional committee "our guidance currently is that masking should happen in all schools."
"Although the Air Force claims to provide a religious accommodation process, it proved to be nothing more than a quixotic quest for Plaintiff because it was 'by all accounts, ... theater.'"
N.Y. appellate court reverses the order.
In a program separate from the ones disclosed by Edward Snowden, we see more mass secret domestic data collection.
The House passed the bill this week with little fanfare and broad bipartisan support.
Both Republicans and Democrats want to address poverty with big government.
H.B. 2802 would expand discrimination protections but would carve out religious institutions.
Neither Republicans nor Democrats can be trusted to give an honest account of what happened that day.
Civil libertarians have reason to be wary of Judge J. Michelle Childs.
“Defend the Guard” laws would keep state troops out of conflicts that Congress hasn’t authorized.
An interesting exchange on the implications of early agency power to revise tax assessments.
Plus: Mask mandates and omicron cases, purging "pornography" drives calls for book bans, and more...
The governor needs to leave his fancy Sacramento-area compound more often to see what's going on throughout the state.
A unanimous panel rejects a Trump Administration change to rules on collective bargaining for government workers.
Defense lawyer Amy Phillips is suing over what she calls the department's "watchlist policy."
Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves' grudging support for medical marijuana speaks volumes about the erosion of support for prohibition.
There are more productive things to argue about than identify politics.
Plus: The #OldProProject, food truck police, and more...
A pastor and a nonprofit challenge occupational licensing rules.
By saying the quiet part loud, the former president should spur Congress into action.
Chipmakers don't need the money, and they won't get it until after the current mess has been resolved.
Not by changing the filibuster rules, but by stressing them.
The North Carolina congressman's opponents argue that the 14th Amendment disqualifies him from seeking reelection.
Not everything in the bill would keep America competitive, but the immigration provisions certainly would.
Those who demand a revival of antitrust regulation to "promote competition" may not realize that they're inciting a revival of cronyism to suppress competition.
Breyer’s deference to law enforcement often led him to sell the Fourth Amendment short.
His judicial philosophy emphasized promotion of democracy, a theme in tension with his emphasis on the need for deference to expertise.
Plus: College students and speech, state-funded pre-K fail, and more...
The New York State Supreme Court ruled that Governor Hochul and the health commissioner did not have the authority to mandate a masking requirement
A House Energy Subcommittee Hearing entertains dangerous and disingenuous rhetoric against technologies for freedom.
Insofar as the Court was concerned about pretext, it may be more difficult for the EPA to reduce greenhouse gases using regulatory authority to control emissions.
Will bipartisanship fix Joe Biden's presidency?
The Sacketts get a return trip to the Supreme Court.