Justice Barrett, Trump v. Slaughter, and Presidential Removal Power from 1969 to 1989
Humphrey's Executor from 1969 to 1989.
Humphrey's Executor from 1969 to 1989.
Without any real consequences for copyright infringements, the Department of Homeland Security doesn't have much incentive to follow the law.
Almost every president since 1945 has refused to accept Humphrey's Executor as having been correctly decided.
President Franklin D. Roosevelt did his best to defend presidential removal power at will notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s lawless decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States.
Contrary to widespread speculation, the Court's first opinion of an argued case concerned neither Trump's tariffs nor voting rights.
The Death by Lightning miniseries dramatizes the assassination of a president who left little lasting impact on Americans' lives.
Medicaid fraud has been endemic at the state and federal levels for decades. Focusing on a single official or state misses a deeper lesson.
Every President from 1921 to 1933 successfully defended presidential removal power at will.
The Supreme Court’s January docket is packed with big cases.
"Violence is anything that threatens them and their safety, so it is doxing them, it's videotaping them where they're at when they're out on operations," Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said.
That embarrassing mistake highlights the slipperiness of Trump's attempts to justify legally dubious policies by invoking the specter of "foreign terrorist organizations."
Every president from 1901 to 1921 successfully defended presidential removal power at will.
The "filings have led to the Court completely losing trust in" the lawyers involved.
The president is making real progress on deregulation, but he needs to get Congress involved.
If an indictment is enough to justify military action, why bother seeking congressional approval?
Zohran Mamdani signs executive orders to speed up new construction. His housing policy picks also want to abolish private property.
Every president from 1881 to 1901 successfully defended presidential at-will removal power.
Plus: Thank capitalism for the best parts of college football bowl season
Roberts' year-end report on the federal judiciary includes some notable statements about the Declaration and its relevance to constitutional interpretation and judicial review.
The NYT profiles a sloppy and highly problematic empirical study of the Supreme Court.
His explanation for why the Trump administration attacked Venezuela without congressional authorization does not stand up to scrutiny.
You don't need a detailed theory to explain the departing congresswoman's journey.
While Europe and Asia have had Stellest glasses for years, the FDA finally approved them for the U.S. in 2025.
Here as elsewhere, lethargy in the legislature is no way to counter execss energy in the executive.
Maduro is a brutal dictator who is getting what he deserves. But Trump's actions are still illegal, because lacking proper congressional authorization. Whether they result in a beneficial regime change in Venezuela remains to be seen.
The president asserted broad powers to deport people, impose tariffs, and deploy the National Guard based on his own unilateral determinations.
Yes, the status quo is unsustainable. But Romney's proposed solution risks making those problems harder to fix while foreclosing opportunities for the next generation.
Puzzling over a curious omission from the conservative justice.
An opportunity to work at the nation's leading libertarian think tank.
Presidents, legislators, and police officers were desperate to blame anyone but themselves.
Federal Medicaid policy creates little incentive for states to stop potential fraudsters. Fixing that should be the priority, not demonizing Somali immigrants.
From college sports to league expansion, politicians are going to have plenty of sway over sports next year.
Is unfettered majority rule actually a good idea for the left to embrace?
It is yet another ruling that shields the government from liability for damages caused by law enforcement.
Sen. Marsha Blackburn’s latest is an anti-tech omnibus, combining years' worth of dangerous policy ideas into one big, bad bill.
Critics of cash bail say it creates a two-tiered justice system: Those who can pay maintain their freedom, while those unable to pay remain behind bars.
The right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure had a rocky 2025.
The justices suggested the president is misinterpreting "the regular forces," a key phrase in the statute on which he is relying.
In addition to its symbolic significance, rescheduling the drug will facilitate research and provide tax relief to state-licensed cannabis suppliers.
Oh, so now the Trump administration is worried about the complexity of its tariff polices?
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.