Ohio Judge Deems the State's COVID-19 Lockdown 'Arbitrary, Unreasonable, and Oppressive'
The ruling says the state's top health official exceeded her statutory authority by ordering "nonessential" businesses to close.
The ruling says the state's top health official exceeded her statutory authority by ordering "nonessential" businesses to close.
Congress created inspectors general to be watchdogs, but it's too weak-willed to protect those watchdogs from retaliation.
A local judge has concluded the State Health Director likely exceeded her powers under the Ohio Constitution
John Baker and Robert Miller identify an alternative
Courts are beginning to recognize that public health powers, while broad, are not a blank check.
"We have long interpreted the Georgia Constitution as protecting a right to work in one's chosen profession free from unreasonable government interference."
An under-the-radar environmental lawsuit could provide the Supreme Court another opportunity to revive the nondelegation doctrine.
A new paper by Thomas Frampton suggests most recent commentary concerning the Michael Flynn prosecution gets it wrong.
In a brief exchange during a recent oral argument, the Justice suggested the Court should reconsider giving states "special solicitude" under Massachusetts v. EPA
Businesses need to be able to adjust to a world where COVID-19 remains an ongoing concern.
We submitted another strange bedfellows amicus brief on severability in the Texas ACA case.
A seemingly arcane dispute about administrative law has profound implications for the limits of public health authority.
An effort by Sen. Rand Paul to forbid warrantless investigation of citizens was soundly defeated.
The Supreme Court weighs the congressional subpoena power in Trump v. Mazars.
There is a difference between reporting facts that make the president uncomfortable and manufacturing facts to fit a preconceived view of him.
Why the Supreme Court can rule in favor of Congress in the Trump financial records cases without thereby giving Congress any unlimited power.
Do legislative subpoenas really need a limiting principle?
The new bill includes another round of stimulus checks for all Americans, funds additional coronavirus testing, and spends billions to bail out states and government agencies straining under pension debt.
There was a potentially pivotal exchange in today's Supreme Court oral argument over the House subpoenas seeking the President's financial records.
An amendment to a FISA renewal bill would let the FBI snoop on your online browser history.
Officials in six Pennsylvania counties say they will allow businesses to reopen without permission from the state government. Expect more of that.
Forcing Google to behave like a public utility would probably not serve the interests of those demanding that designation—or the rest of us.
The Supreme Court will consider the constitutionality of a Louisiana law that requires physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at local hospitals.
The ability of Americans to buy meat in grocery stores is at risk due to serious supply-chain issues caused by COVID-19.
The federal government has done a terrible job managing the coronavirus. It doesn't deserve our labor.
A Reuters investigation reveals courts "growing tendency" to grant cops immunity from civil rights lawsuits.
An abuse of power that doesn't violate federal fraud statutes can still be an impeachable offense - and still violate other criminal law.
The federal courts start to grapple with COVID-19 shutdown orders.
The USPS has lost $78 billion since 2007, but could lose as much as $13 billion this year as the pandemic has crushed mail volume.
The 1961 speech by President Dwight Eisenhower foreshadowed the current government's response to COVID-19.
Why does it matter is a federal agency is independent of Presidential control? Ask the Department of Defense.
So a Maryland appellate court held last month, I think quite correctly (and consistently with the broad trend in other states):
CNN reports that Attorney General Barr is (again) voicing opposition to DOJ's argument that zeroing out the mandate penalty should upend the entire law.
Early takeaways from the country's response to a pandemic
A review of Richard Epstein's latest book: The Dubious Morality of Modern Administrative Law
Before spending another dollar, Congress should make sure someone is keeping an eye how the largest pile of government cash in American history is being spent.
We need essential workers right now. We also need markets and the price signals they provide.
Infectious disease, public health, and the Constitution
In an interview, the freshly-minted presidential candidate talks abortion, the "spoiler" charge, and Joe Biden's flip-flopping, while insisting that 2020 is a "winnable race."
The NLRB's prosecution of a conservative journalist should be worrisome.
Plus: Justin Amash seeking L.P. nomination, pandemic hasn't halted FDA war on vaping, and more
Absurd enforcement of liquor regulations harms public health efforts.
Yes, the Reason Roundtable podcast has gone quarantine-crazy.
The state has already appealed the decision to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Younger people aren't immune to the coronavirus but they are less likely to die or be hospitalized because of it. Let them choose their own risk.
Requiring unanimous juries underscores the gravity of a death penalty sentence.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.