Federal Circuit Judges Question Trump's Discovery of Vast Tariff Powers
The president is claiming "unbounded authority" to impose import taxes based on a law that does not mention them.
The president is claiming "unbounded authority" to impose import taxes based on a law that does not mention them.
A textualist solution to controversies over religious hiring.
A federal court says U.S. citizens “are likely to succeed in showing” that immigration agents violated their rights.
Joe and Russell Marino will finally get their day in court. The ruling represents a turning of the tide when it comes to the fairness of such proceedings, where agencies have long played both prosecutor and jury.
"[T]he sheer breadth of the discovery sought in Türkiye's Application, considered in light of the colorable allegations of political motivation presented in support of Turkyolu's motion, weighs heavily against the Application at this time."
The turning point was the New Deal.
An important church–state question likely headed to the Supreme Court.
Websites are being told to create "Material Harmful to Minors tax accounts."
President Trump’s invocation of emergency powers to impose tariffs faces skeptical judges.
After a public outcry, the scheduled vote on the plan to use eminent domain has been postponed indefinitely. If the Town of Toms River does try to condemn the church, there is likely to be a major legal battle.
In Chandler v. Brown, the Sixth Circuit may have been too quick (again) to grant a habeas petition.
And generations of allegedly anti-corruption Republicans just don't care.
The case is a baffling reminder that the more power a government official has, the harder it is for a victim to get a shot at justice.
Canada accounts for a tiny percentage of fentanyl smuggling, which cannot be stopped by trying harder.
A defense to Steve Vladeck's critique and a brief comment on Adrian Vermeule's related op-ed in the New York Times.
Federal overspending is squeezing states and cities, forcing them to raise taxes, slash services, or pile on more debt.
If so, then why postpone any enforcement until October?
Lawmakers say a new DHS rule requiring advance notice for detention center visits undermines congressional oversight.
With near-total control of Congress, Nayib Bukele’s party eliminated key limits on presidential power.
We still need real tax reform and much lower federal spending.
A defendant has challenged Acting New Jersey U.S. Attorney Alina Habba's appointment under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, but he has no real case under the statute's plain language.
Amid reports of Palestinian starvation, a majority of the Democratic Caucus—but no Republicans—voted to block U.S. weapons shipments to Israel.
It makes the case for strong judicial review of executive invocations of sweeping emergency powers.
Joshua Rohrer's dog, Sunshine, ran away and was later hit and killed by a car.
Even though the president has lost every time the orders have come before a judge, big law firms are still hesitant to upset the king and incur his wrath.
Rushing out opinions can lock in erroneous conclusions and create problematic precedent.
The anticommandeering doctrine stands in the way of Trump’s immigration crackdown.
It's time to ask what level of spending Americans truly want with the money we actually have.
Years after home equity theft was ruled unconstitutional, Michigan keeps looking for ways around the ruling.
To win in court, the Trump administration will have to argue against a pair of legal theories that conservatives have spent years developing as a way to check executive power.
The Department's filing makes a strong case that Habba's appointment is proper. The courts should quickly reject defendants' challenge to the appointment.
A federal court concluded the official was entitled to qualified immunity in a case that united two unlikely allies.
Acting through through Section 546, or temporarily through the Federal Vacancies Reform Act, the Attorney General is entitled to appoint U.S. Attorneys for the District of New Jersey and all other federal judicial districts. If done properly, such appointments preempt any need for judges to appoint U.S. Attorneys. But it is important that the President submit a nominee for the position for Senate confirmation.
The Supreme Court's critics are too quick to assume the Court's orders are motivated by political considerations as opposed to principle.
Air traffic control is simply too important to leave up to the politicians.
In FY 2024, over 200,000 Freedom of Information Act requests were backlogged, according to the Government Accountability Office.
The twist underscores just how little accountability exists in civil forfeiture, which allows law enforcement to seize assets without charging the owner with a crime.
Steve Calabresi's argument that judges cannot make such interim appointments is ultimately unpersuasive, as the Appointments Clause specifically allows Congress to vest such power in the Judiciary.
Environmental Protection Agency
Idaho landowners are facing ruinous fines because the Army Corps of Engineers refuses to follow the Supreme Court’s Clean Water Act ruling in Sackett v. EPA.
The new warehousing fee targets booze producers, but drinkers could end up paying most of the tab.
The Third Circuit held that such organizations may raise religious exemption claims, though it declined to decide (at this stage of the litigation) whether the claim would prevail on the facts of this case.
The attorney general can appoint interim U.S. Attorneys to successive 120-day terms of office unless the nominee is someone to whom the Senate has refused to give advice and consent by a vote either in committee or on the floor.
A federal judge ruled that Peninsula Township’s former restrictions on music, events, and grape sourcing violated the rights of local wineries.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks