If Congress Bans Abortion, This New Deal Precedent Will Be at the Center of the Legal Battles
A 1942 decision about the Commerce Clause takes on new importance post-Roe.
A 1942 decision about the Commerce Clause takes on new importance post-Roe.
The "waiver" opens the door for Bannon to testify before the congressional January 6 Committee. But former presidents are not entitled to executive privilege, and especially not when it comes to testimony by private citizens.
Here's hoping we don't wind up with more of the spending and favoritism that's become so common.
The former president's recklessness is beyond dispute, but that is not enough to convict him while respecting the First Amendment.
National legislation and extraterritorial application of state laws are inconsistent with the local leeway that the Constitution protects.
Members of Congress keep saying they want to allow state-legal pot businesses to have access to the banking system, but they keep refusing to actually do it.
The inconvenient truth behind all the COVID-19 relief fraud and waste is that these government programs never should have been designed as they were.
Prominent Democrats including Joe Manchin oppose a bad idea whose time has seemingly not yet come.
The Ocean Shipping Reform Act fulfills the political need to do something but probably won’t help.
Plus: Purity politics, the end of the "millennial consumer subsidy," an unhappy outcome for folks seeking to free Happy the elephant, and more...
The government should loosen laws, reduce conflict between government and the public, and let people defend themselves.
If Congress decides to encourage them, it should not overlook the importance of due process protections.
Most of those open to evidence already know that Trump tried to reverse the outcome of an election he legitimately lost. Reaching the rest is likely to be extremely difficult, at best.
Plus: Competing stories about antitrust reform, capitalism didn't cause the formula crisis, and more...
Plus: Families sue over Texas directive on care for transgender kids, teleworker taxes will come before Ohio Supreme Court, and more...
Under Biden, Trump, and Obama, government federal spending almost doubled.
An analysis of such crimes suggests the president’s policy prescriptions are unlikely to have a meaningful impact.
Presidents once treated congressional authorization as a requirement for the U.S. to enter conflicts. What went wrong?
The president's argument is amazing for its tone-deafness, inconsistent thinking, and sheer economic ignorance.
It signals that many in Congress still condemn America's role in the war and actions from the president that lack proper authorization.
Because there is no reliable way to identify future mass shooters, it is inevitable that many innocent people will lose their Second Amendment rights.
Congress has radically restricted the number of pilots without doing anything to increase safety.
And one or the other is likely our fate too.
Democrats are trying to inject a political solution into an economic problem.
Plus: a debate about sex work, Facebook blocks a baby formula recipe, and more...
Without citing any constitutional authority to dictate state abortion policies, the bill would have overridden regulations that have been upheld or have yet to be tested.
Like AUMFs before it, Rep. Adam Kinzinger’s proposed authorization would lead to less transparency in conflicts and more unilateral decision making.
Plus: Homeland Security's new Disinformation Governance Board, the FDA's menthol ban, and more...
Chuck Schumer seems less interested in achieving cannabis reform than in making political hay from his inevitable failure.
Plus: Wikipedia vs. crypto, Elon Musk takes on Twitter, and more...
Four economists at the Federal Reserve say America's high rate of inflation relative to the rest of the world is the result of surging disposable income during the pandemic.
Instead of building on Republican support for federalism, they seem determined to alienate potential allies.
Just three Republicans voted for the MORE Act, two fewer than in 2020.
Majority Leader Chuck Schumer worries that approving the SAFE Banking Act would make broader changes less likely.
A ruling in a dispute over emails sought by the January 6 committee agrees that Trump's actions likely violated two federal laws.
But 37 states allow medical or recreational use, and arrests are falling.
Someone might want to remind them that Democrats have a majority in both congressional chambers.
Congress used the COVID-19 pandemic as an excuse to throw money around in ways that would be comedic if the results weren't so tragic.
Lawmakers packed $8 billion of pork into the omnibus bill that passed Congress last night.
Before she can make her case to the voters, Angela Pence has to collect signatures that she would not need if she were a Democrat or a Republican.
The SAFE SEX Workers Study Act would look at the impact of FOSTA and the seizure of sites like Backpage and Rentboy.
Democrats hail the new budget agreement as "the largest increase in non-defense discretionary spending in four years" while Republicans tout a big boost in military spending. Everyone wins!
A spending bill provision would redefine "tobacco products" to include products that have nothing to do with tobacco.
We must face the reality that the debt does matter.
From the CDC to the FDA, there are too many missteps to list.
A bipartisan group of lawmakers are calling for two deficit reduction ideas to be included in this year's federal budget bill.
Plus: Republican policy priorities, SCOTUS to take same-sex wedding website refusal case, and more...
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks