Encryption Wars Ramp Up As Apple Improves Phone Security
Law enforcement is upset, but data security is vital to prevent crimes.
Law enforcement is upset, but data security is vital to prevent crimes.
A new report shows that the recent trend of reducing prison populations is heavily an urban phenomenon.
Good intentions may backfire on campus.
Although some have argued that qualified immunity encourages constitutional innovation, this defense of qualified immunity should not save the doctrine from the chopping block.
There's room for reasonable disagreement on many aspects of the latest ACA litigation, but the severability question should be clear.
A plan to divide California into three states will be on the state's referendum ballot in November. If it passes and is approved by Congress, it could potentially be a significant change for the better.
A Chicago suburb's law to confiscate firearms and magazines has been blocked by a temporary restraining order.
The Supreme Court should do away with or restrict qualified immunity because, in Justice Sotomayor's words, it "renders the protections" of the Constitution "hollow."
A mom says her daughter was almost abducted at a rest stop. That's a stretch.
Commutations for people serving absurdly long sentences would be a great new way to torture the attorney general.
Although the Supreme Court says qualified immunity is necessary to protect government officials from financial liability and the costs and burdens of litigation, all available evidence suggests the doctrine fails to achieve these intended policy goals.
The latest state challenge to the ACA is clever. The Justice Department's response is not.
Noted attorney George Conway dismantles the constitutional arguments against Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation
If the Supreme Court takes Justice Thomas's suggestion to reconsider qualified immunity and takes seriously available evidence about qualified immunity's historical precedents and current operation, the Court could not justify continued existence of the doctrine in its current form.
I discuss last week's Supreme Court opinions and much more with Professors Dan Epps and Ian Samuel.
Defamation insurance, child labor, and a virulently racist attorney.
Did his murderer walk because Virginia law did not permit African Americans to testify against whites?
He has been a Democrat, a Republican, a lobbyist, and a cancer survivor. Now he wants to end the war on weed.
The president has discovered the power of the pardon. Could that make this a moment for criminal justice reform?
A 75-year-old woman who threatened to call a code enforcement officer's supervisor ended up in jail.
And woe to anyone who attempts to inform tribal members that there may be alternatives to their traditional practices.
The Georgia Court of Appeals rejected Snapchat's federal 47 U.S.C. sec. 230 defense, though Snapchat may still win under Georgia law.
Leave it to Kim Kardashian West to secure freedom for a prisoner of the drug war (seriously, she's good at it).
California voters just encouraged judges to show no mercy.
A plea for a more refined view, inspired by yesterday's decision in Hughes.
With the D.C. primary approaching, candidates are quizzed on a bill that would decriminalize prostitution in the district.
Filing false police reports isn't funny. It can get people killed.
Conduct that does not meet the legal criteria for an obstruction charge could still be serious enough to justify impeachment.
Actually having sex would just be a misdemeanor.
Barbara Underwood is outraged by the president's use of his clemency power, and she wants state legislators to do something about it.
How did an accusation of underage drinking end up with a 20-year-old eating sand?
The Democrat-controlled Rhode Island state Senate agrees with President Donald Trump that harsher punishments are needed for drug dealers. Wrong!
"I figured a police officer would know what illegal drugs looked like."
Rustem Kazazi was victimized by desperadoes from a gang called "Customs and Border Patrol," but thanks to the Institute for Justice he's fighting back.
Judges were told not require cash bail from defendants who were too poor to pay. Instead they're not offering bail at all.
Although the state recognizes cannabis as a treatment for epilepsy, it says letting your son use it is "reckless conduct."
We offer how-tos, personal stories, and guides for all kinds of activities that can and do happen right at the borders of legally permissible behavior.
His mother, Lyn Ulbricht, talks about her son's life in maximum security prison and their Supreme Court hopes for the Silk Road case.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks